Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Wroclaw, Poland
University of Wroclaw
University of Wroclaw has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 21, 2026.
University of Wroclaw AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of Wroclaw has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 21, 2026. Discovery context: University of Wroclaw is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Wroclaw as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 21, 2026 and last changed on May 21, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-wroclaw.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Wroclaw has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Wroclaw has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Wroclaw has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Wroclaw has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: required.
Academic integrity
University of Wroclaw has 4 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
University of Wroclaw has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Wroclaw has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Wroclaw has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Wroclaw has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
The University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards treat content generated with natural-language processing tools and other AI algorithms as non-author content that must be clearly marked.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI-generated content must be clearly marked as content not authored by the student/author.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Niezbędne jest prawidłowe oznaczanie tradycyjnych źródeł bibliograficznych oraz innych treści, które nie są naszego autorstwa, w szczególności wygenerowanych przy użyciu narzędzi komputerowych służących do przetwarzania języka naturalnego oraz innych algorytmów sztucznej inteligencji.
Localized display only
The standards require marking non-author content, especially content generated using natural-language processing tools and other AI algorithms.
Ai Tool Treatment
Under the University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards, instructors may permit AI tools for class work on specified terms, and students must acknowledge the AI use in the text or code when such use is allowed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Instructor-permitted AI use must follow stated course terms and be acknowledged in text or code.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Wykładowcy mogą dopuścić użycie m.in. narzędzi sztucznej inteligencji w ramach prowadzonych zajęć w określony sposób i na określonych warunkach, co powinno być zawsze wyraźnie zaznaczone w regulaminie zajęć i/lub w sylabusie.
Localized display only
Instructors may allow AI tools in classes in a specified way and on specified terms, which should be clearly stated in the course rules and/or syllabus.
Ai Tool Treatment
The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team says AI tools may be used in research work for theses or term papers within arrangements with the supervisor or adviser, but their use must be ancillary and must not replace the author's critical thinking.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI use in theses/term papers may be ancillary when agreed with the supervisor/adviser; it may not replace the author's work.
Original evidence
Evidence 1W ramach ustaleń z promotorem/opiekunem pracy możliwe jest wykorzystanie narzędzi AI w pracy badawczej. Działanie AI nie może jednak nigdy zastępować krytycznego myślenia autora.
Localized display only
Within arrangements with the supervisor/adviser, AI tools may be used in research work, but AI must never replace the author's critical thinking.
Academic Integrity
The 2026 ZWA recommendations say authors are responsible for the final text and should disclose the scope of AI-tool use in their work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Authors must remain responsible for final text and disclose the scope of AI use.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Autor zawsze bierze odpowiedzialność za ostateczny kształt tekstu i jest zobowiązany do poinformowania o zakresie wykorzystania narzędzi AI w swojej pracy.
Localized display only
The author remains responsible for the final form of the text and must inform about the scope of AI-tool use in the work.
Academic Integrity
The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team FAQ tells students that all AI-tool use in university work must be agreed with the instructor or supervisor, and that AI should not be treated as a generator that creates a thesis instead of the student.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Student AI use in university work requires instructor/supervisor agreement; AI should not generate a thesis in place of student work.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Wykorzystanie wszystkich narzędzi AI w pracy uniwersyteckiej musi być uzgodnione z prowadzącym lub promotorem. Nie można postrzegać AI jako generatora tworzącego pracę zamiast studenta.
Localized display only
Use of any AI tools in university work must be agreed with the instructor or supervisor. AI should not be seen as a generator creating the work instead of the student.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
FAQ - Zespół wsparcia antyplagiatowego UWr
antyplagiat.uwr.edu.pl
Rekomendacje ZWA w sprawie oznaczania wykorzystania AI w pracach dyplomowych i zaliczeniowych
antyplagiat.uwr.edu.pl
Uchwała nr 1/2024 UKJK w sprawie standardów uczciwości akademickiej
antyplagiat.uwr.edu.pl
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.