Wroclaw, Poland

University of Wroclaw

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3Source languageplPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-wroclaw.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

University of Wroclaw has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence74%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

University of Wroclaw has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records1

AI tools

University of Wroclaw

Tool
AI tools
About
Not specified
Access
Not specified
Cost
Not specified
Availability
Blocked / restricted
Review
Agent reviewed

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

The University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards treat content generated with natural-language processing tools and other AI algorithms as non-author content that must be clearly marked.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: AI-generated content must be clearly marked as content not authored by the student/author.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Niezbędne jest prawidłowe oznaczanie tradycyjnych źródeł bibliograficznych oraz innych treści, które nie są naszego autorstwa, w szczególności wygenerowanych przy użyciu narzędzi komputerowych służących do przetwarzania języka naturalnego oraz innych algorytmów sztucznej inteligencji.

Localized display only

The standards require marking non-author content, especially content generated using natural-language processing tools and other AI algorithms.

Ai Tool Treatment

Under the University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards, instructors may permit AI tools for class work on specified terms, and students must acknowledge the AI use in the text or code when such use is allowed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: Instructor-permitted AI use must follow stated course terms and be acknowledged in text or code.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Wykładowcy mogą dopuścić użycie m.in. narzędzi sztucznej inteligencji w ramach prowadzonych zajęć w określony sposób i na określonych warunkach, co powinno być zawsze wyraźnie zaznaczone w regulaminie zajęć i/lub w sylabusie.

Localized display only

Instructors may allow AI tools in classes in a specified way and on specified terms, which should be clearly stated in the course rules and/or syllabus.

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team says AI tools may be used in research work for theses or term papers within arrangements with the supervisor or adviser, but their use must be ancillary and must not replace the author's critical thinking.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: AI use in theses/term papers may be ancillary when agreed with the supervisor/adviser; it may not replace the author's work.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
W ramach ustaleń z promotorem/opiekunem pracy możliwe jest wykorzystanie narzędzi AI w pracy badawczej. Działanie AI nie może jednak nigdy zastępować krytycznego myślenia autora.

Localized display only

Within arrangements with the supervisor/adviser, AI tools may be used in research work, but AI must never replace the author's critical thinking.

Academic Integrity

The 2026 ZWA recommendations say authors are responsible for the final text and should disclose the scope of AI-tool use in their work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Authors must remain responsible for final text and disclose the scope of AI use.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Autor zawsze bierze odpowiedzialność za ostateczny kształt tekstu i jest zobowiązany do poinformowania o zakresie wykorzystania narzędzi AI w swojej pracy.

Localized display only

The author remains responsible for the final form of the text and must inform about the scope of AI-tool use in the work.

Academic Integrity

The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team FAQ tells students that all AI-tool use in university work must be agreed with the instructor or supervisor, and that AI should not be treated as a generator that creates a thesis instead of the student.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: Student AI use in university work requires instructor/supervisor agreement; AI should not generate a thesis in place of student work.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Wykorzystanie wszystkich narzędzi AI w pracy uniwersyteckiej musi być uzgodnione z prowadzącym lub promotorem. Nie można postrzegać AI jako generatora tworzącego pracę zamiast studenta.

Localized display only

Use of any AI tools in university work must be agreed with the instructor or supervisor. AI should not be seen as a generator creating the work instead of the student.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

FAQ - Zespół wsparcia antyplagiatowego UWr

antyplagiat.uwr.edu.pl

Snapshot hash
b647846e8dc29db51a4c37c487f6082f7d9c3b6e955c99c18812aabfdf3c335a

Change log

Last checkedMay 21, 2026Last changedMay 21, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities