Policy presence
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Poznań, Poland
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 6 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 6 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 6 official source attributions, including 6 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań is listed as QS 2026 rank 741-750.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 6 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/adam-mickiewicz-university-poznan.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Academic integrity
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Teaching guidance
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Adam Mickiewicz University has Rector order 426/2023/2024 setting rules for student use of AI systems in education, including theses and coursework/assessment work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: rector_order_ai_systems_student_education
Original evidence
Evidence 1§ 1 Zarządzenie określa zasady korzystania z systemów sztucznej inteligencji (systemy SI) w procesie kształcenia studentów, w szczególności w przygotowaniu pracy dyplomowej oraz prac etapowych i zaliczeniowych.
Localized display only
Section 1 says the order sets rules for using AI systems in student education, especially thesis preparation and coursework/assessment work.
Teaching
For classroom/course work, AMU recommends that the course coordinator choose the appropriate level of AI-use control based on the syllabus, and that the instructor inform students about permission or prohibition at the first class.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_ai_use_level_selected_by_coordinator_informed_first_class
Original evidence
Evidence 1Decyzję o wyborze odpowiedniego poziomu podejmuje koordynator przedmiotu w oparciu o treści i efekty uczenia się zapisane w obowiązującym sylabusie przedmiotu. Osoba prowadząca zajęcia powinna poinformować studentów stosownie o możliwości, bądź zakazie, korzystania z systemów generatywnej SI na pierwszych zajęciach
Localized display only
The course coordinator chooses the AI-use control level based on the syllabus, and the instructor should inform students at the first class whether generative AI use is permitted or prohibited.
Academic Integrity
For diploma theses, AMU states that before using generative AI systems a student should consult the goals, methods, and scope of use with the thesis supervisor.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: thesis_generative_ai_consult_supervisor
Original evidence
Evidence 1Przed wykorzystaniem systemów generujących treści w ramach pracy dyplomowej, student powinien skonsultować cele, sposoby oraz zakres ich wykorzystania z opiekunem naukowym.
Localized display only
Before using content-generating systems in a thesis, the student should consult the goals, methods, and scope with the academic supervisor.
Academic Integrity
AMU classroom guidance says that, in course contexts where permission or marking is required, use of generative AI tools without permission or without appropriate marking is treated in the same way as plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unauthorized_or_unmarked_course_ai_use_treated_like_plagiarism
Original evidence
Evidence 1Użycie takich narzędzi bez zgody prowadzącego, w jakiejkolwiek części pracy przygotowanej w ramach tego przedmiotu, będzie traktowane w taki sam sposób jak plagiat. [...] Użycie takich narzędzi bez odpowiedniego oznaczenia, w jakiejkolwiek części pracy przygotowanej w ramach tego przedmiotu, będzie traktowane w taki sam sposób jak plagiat.
Localized display only
Use without instructor permission, or without appropriate marking where marking is required, is treated the same way as plagiarism for work prepared within that course.
Source Status
AMU's public AI FAQ identifies Rector order 426/2023/2024 as the act regulating AI matters in education at UAM.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: faq_identifies_order_426_as_ai_education_regulating_act
Original evidence
Evidence 1Czy na UAM istnieje akt regulujący sprawy dot. SI w kształceniu? Tak, jest nim: Zarządzenie nr 426/2023/2024 Rektora Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu z dnia 20 marca 2024 roku w sprawie zasad korzystania z systemów sztucznej inteligencji w procesie kształcenia studentów
Localized display only
The FAQ says Rector order 426/2023/2024 is the act regulating AI matters in education at UAM.
Privacy
AMU research guidance warns that using online generative AI usually sends prompt information to the service provider, and recommends anonymizing content such as names, places, dates, and other person-identifying fragments.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_generative_ai_online_prompt_data_anonymization
Original evidence
Evidence 1Konwersacja z systemem GSI wiąże się zazwyczaj z przesłaniem do usługodawcy całości informacji, które uwzględnimy w poleceniu (promptcie), w tym również plików graficznych, wideo, głosowych i innych. Z tego powodu powinniśmy zadbać o odpowiednią anonimizację treści, np. poprzez usunięcie nazw indywidualnych (imion, miejsc), dat i innych fragmentów wskazujących na konkretną osobę.
Localized display only
The guidance says online GAI conversations usually send prompt information to the provider, so users should anonymize content by removing names, places, dates, and other person-identifying fragments.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
6 source attribution
FAQ
amu.edu.pl
Praca na zajęciach
amu.edu.pl
Praca naukowa
amu.edu.pl
Prace dyplomowe
amu.edu.pl
SI na UAM
amu.edu.pl
Zarządzenie nr 426/2023/2024 Rektora Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu z dnia 20 marca 2024 roku w sprawie zasad korzystania z systemów sztucznej inteligencji w procesie kształcenia studentów
bip.amu.edu.pl
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.