Policy presence
Warsaw University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Warsaw, Poland
Warsaw University of Technology
Warsaw University of Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank =487. Warsaw University of Technology has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Warsaw University of Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank =487. Warsaw University of Technology has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Warsaw University of Technology as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/warsaw-university-of-technology.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Warsaw University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Warsaw University of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Warsaw University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Warsaw University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Warsaw University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Named AI services
Warsaw University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Warsaw University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Warsaw University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Source Status
Warsaw University of Technology has central Polish-language recommendations on the use of generative AI, attached to a March 2024 Senate position and later identified by a November 2024 Senate position as an integral part of WUT research-policy materials.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_polish_genai_recommendations_senate_linked
Original evidence
Evidence 1Załącznik do stanowiska nr 1AL/2024 Senatu PW z dnia 27 marca 2024 r. Rekomendacje dotyczące korzystania z systemów generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji w Politechnice Warszawskiej.
Localized display only
Attachment to WUT Senate position 1AL/2024: recommendations on using generative AI systems at Warsaw University of Technology.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Integralną część Polityki naukowej, o której mowa w ust. 1, stanowią następujące dokumenty: ... Rekomendacje dotyczące korzystania z systemów generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji w Politechnice Warszawskiej.
Localized display only
The Senate position identifies the GenAI recommendations as an integral part of the listed WUT research-policy documents.
Privacy
WUT recommendations say users may not provide personal data, sensitive data, or other non-public information in prompts to GenAI systems, except for systems that do not share information with third parties, and should ensure generated-content use does not infringe third-party copyright.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no_personal_sensitive_nonpublic_data_in_external_genai_prompts_check_copyright
Original evidence
Evidence 1W zapytaniach do systemów GenAI nie można podawać danych osobowych, w tym danych wrażliwych lub innych informacji o charakterze niepublicznym (np. szczegółowych danych finansowych). ... Należy upewnić się, że planowane użycie wygenerowanych treści nie narusza praw autorskich osób trzecich.
Localized display only
Prompts to GenAI systems may not include personal, sensitive, or other non-public information; users should also check third-party copyright.
Academic Integrity
WUT recommendations say students, doctoral students, academic staff, and administrative staff are not authors of content generated by GenAI tools, so such materials must be clearly marked with the source of information, and GenAI should be used consistently with scientific integrity and good academic practice.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_outputs_not_user_authorship_mark_source_follow_scientific_integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Student, doktorant, pracownik naukowy czy administracyjny nie są autorami treści wytworzonych przez narzędzia GenAI, dlatego konieczne jest wyraźne oznaczenie takich materiałów, z podaniem źródła pozyskania informacji.
Localized display only
Students, doctoral students, academic staff, and administrative staff are not authors of GenAI-generated content, so such material must be clearly marked with its source.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Narzędzia generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji powinny być wykorzystywane w sposób zgodny z wartościami etycznymi, w szczególności zasadami rzetelności naukowej i dobrymi praktykami akademickimi.
Localized display only
Generative AI tools should be used consistently with ethical values, especially scientific integrity and good academic practice.
Ai Tool Treatment
WUT recommendations say generative AI systems may support education and other university work, but users are responsible for how GenAI-generated content is used and are advised to verify and critically assess AI-generated materials.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_may_support_work_user_responsible_verify_outputs
Original evidence
Evidence 1Podobnie jak inne narzędzia technologiczne systemy generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji mogą służyć wsparciu procesu kształcenia, zdobywania wiedzy i umiejętności.
Localized display only
Like other technological tools, generative AI systems may support education and acquiring knowledge and skills.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Należy pamiętać, że za sposób wykorzystania treści wytworzonych przez GenAI odpowiedzialny jest użytkownik. Informacje uzyskane za pomocą narzędzi GenAI mogą być niedokładne, wprowadzające w błąd lub wręcz nieprawdziwe.
Localized display only
The user is responsible for how GenAI-generated content is used; GenAI information may be inaccurate, misleading, or false.
Teaching
WUT recommendations advise instructors to consider adding information to course regulations on whether and how GenAI systems may be used, and state that instructors or supervisors may directly prohibit GenAI use for work such as tests, exams, or expert opinions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: instructors_consider_course_genai_rules_and_may_directly_prohibit_specific_uses
Original evidence
Evidence 1Rekomenduje się, aby nauczyciele akademiccy i inni prowadzący zajęcia rozważyli wprowadzenie do regulaminów przedmiotów informacji czy i w jaki sposób systemy generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji mogą być wykorzystywane.
Localized display only
Instructors are advised to consider adding information to course regulations on whether and how GenAI systems may be used.
Original evidence
Evidence 2Nauczyciel akademicki (w przypadku studentów) lub przełożony (w przypadku pracowników) może bezpośrednio zakazać używania GenAI, np. przy pisaniu kolokwiów, egzaminów, ekspertyz itp. Wówczas korzystanie z systemów GenAI jest niedozwolone.
Localized display only
An instructor or supervisor may directly prohibit GenAI use, for example for tests, exams, or expert opinions; then GenAI use is not allowed.
Academic Integrity
An official WUT news item says each diploma thesis created at WUT is automatically checked through the national anti-plagiarism system and USOS/APD for both plagiarism and use of artificial intelligence.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: wut_diploma_theses_automatically_checked_for_plagiarism_and_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Każda praca dyplomowa, która powstała na Politechnice Warszawskiej, jest automatycznie sprawdzana zarówno pod kątem plagiatu (to narzędzie znane od lat), jak i wykorzystania sztucznej inteligencji (nowa funkcjonalność).
Localized display only
Each WUT diploma thesis is automatically checked both for plagiarism and use of artificial intelligence.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Decyzja nr 203/2023 Rektora Politechniki Warszawskiej
bip.pw.edu.pl
Prace dyplomowe z PW sprawdzane pod kątem wykorzystywania narzędzi AI
pw.edu.pl
Rekomendacje dotyczące korzystania z systemów generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji w Politechnice Warszawskiej
bip.pw.edu.pl
Stanowisko nr 1/LI/2024 Senatu Politechniki Warszawskiej
bip.pw.edu.pl
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.