University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Warsaw University of Technology

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims6Sources4Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Warsaw University of Technology currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Warsaw University of Technology. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Warsaw University of Technology combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # Warsaw University of Technology AI policy record
2+source_status: Warsaw University of Technology has central Polish-language recommendations on the use of generative AI, attached to a March 2024 Senate position and later identified by a November 2024 Senate position as an integral part of WUT research-policy materials.
3+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): Załącznik do stanowiska nr 1AL/2024 Senatu PW z dnia 27 marca 2024 r. Rekomendacje dotyczące korzystania z systemów generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji w Politechnice Warszawskiej.
4+privacy: WUT recommendations say users may not provide personal data, sensitive data, or other non-public information in prompts to GenAI systems, except for systems that do not share information with third parties, and should ensure generated-content use does not infringe third-party copyright.
5+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): W zapytaniach do systemów GenAI nie można podawać danych osobowych, w tym danych wrażliwych lub innych informacji o charakterze niepublicznym (np. szczegółowych danych finansowych). ... Należy upewnić się, że planowane użycie wygenerowanych treści nie narusza praw autorskich osób trzecich.
6+academic_integrity: WUT recommendations say students, doctoral students, academic staff, and administrative staff are not authors of content generated by GenAI tools, so such materials must be clearly marked with the source of information, and GenAI should be used consistently with scientific integrity and good academic practice.
7+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): Student, doktorant, pracownik naukowy czy administracyjny nie są autorami treści wytworzonych przez narzędzia GenAI, dlatego konieczne jest wyraźne oznaczenie takich materiałów, z podaniem źródła pozyskania informacji.
8+ai_tool_treatment: WUT recommendations say generative AI systems may support education and other university work, but users are responsible for how GenAI-generated content is used and are advised to verify and critically assess AI-generated materials.
9+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): Podobnie jak inne narzędzia technologiczne systemy generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji mogą służyć wsparciu procesu kształcenia, zdobywania wiedzy i umiejętności.
10+teaching: WUT recommendations advise instructors to consider adding information to course regulations on whether and how GenAI systems may be used, and state that instructors or supervisors may directly prohibit GenAI use for work such as tests, exams, or expert opinions.
11+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): Rekomenduje się, aby nauczyciele akademiccy i inni prowadzący zajęcia rozważyli wprowadzenie do regulaminów przedmiotów informacji czy i w jaki sposób systemy generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji mogą być wykorzystywane.
12+academic_integrity: An official WUT news item says each diploma thesis created at WUT is automatically checked through the national anti-plagiarism system and USOS/APD for both plagiarism and use of artificial intelligence.
13+Evidence (pl, 02a482f5ff2f): Każda praca dyplomowa, która powstała na Politechnice Warszawskiej, jest automatycznie sprawdzana zarówno pod kątem plagiatu (to narzędzie znane od lat), jak i wykorzystania sztucznej inteligencji (nowa funkcjonalność).

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

source_status

Warsaw University of Technology has central Polish-language recommendations on the use of generative AI, attached to a March 2024 Senate position and later identified by a November 2024 Senate position as an integral part of WUT research-policy materials.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence2Languagespl

privacy

WUT recommendations say users may not provide personal data, sensitive data, or other non-public information in prompts to GenAI systems, except for systems that do not share information with third parties, and should ensure generated-content use does not infringe third-party copyright.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagespl

academic_integrity

WUT recommendations say students, doctoral students, academic staff, and administrative staff are not authors of content generated by GenAI tools, so such materials must be clearly marked with the source of information, and GenAI should be used consistently with scientific integrity and good academic practice.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence2Languagespl

ai_tool_treatment

WUT recommendations say generative AI systems may support education and other university work, but users are responsible for how GenAI-generated content is used and are advised to verify and critically assess AI-generated materials.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagespl

teaching

WUT recommendations advise instructors to consider adding information to course regulations on whether and how GenAI systems may be used, and state that instructors or supervisors may directly prohibit GenAI use for work such as tests, exams, or expert opinions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagespl

academic_integrity

An official WUT news item says each diploma thesis created at WUT is automatically checked through the national anti-plagiarism system and USOS/APD for both plagiarism and use of artificial intelligence.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagespl

Source snapshots

4 source attributions