University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Warsaw University of Technology

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims6Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Warsaw University of Technology currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Warsaw University of Technology current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # Warsaw University of Technology AI policy record
2+source_status: Warsaw University of Technology has central Polish-language recommendations on the use of generative AI, attached to a March 2024 Senate position and later identified by a November 2024 Senate position as an integral part of WUT research-policy materials.
3+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): Załącznik do stanowiska nr 1AL/2024 Senatu PW z dnia 27 marca 2024 r. Rekomendacje dotyczące korzystania z systemów generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji w Politechnice Warszawskiej.
4+privacy: WUT recommendations say users may not provide personal data, sensitive data, or other non-public information in prompts to GenAI systems, except for systems that do not share information with third parties, and should ensure generated-content use does not infringe third-party copyright.
5+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): W zapytaniach do systemów GenAI nie można podawać danych osobowych, w tym danych wrażliwych lub innych informacji o charakterze niepublicznym (np. szczegółowych danych finansowych). ... Należy upewnić się, że planowane użycie wygenerowanych treści nie narusza praw autorskich osób trzecich.
6+academic_integrity: WUT recommendations say students, doctoral students, academic staff, and administrative staff are not authors of content generated by GenAI tools, so such materials must be clearly marked with the source of information, and GenAI should be used consistently with scientific integrity and good academic practice.
7+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): Student, doktorant, pracownik naukowy czy administracyjny nie są autorami treści wytworzonych przez narzędzia GenAI, dlatego konieczne jest wyraźne oznaczenie takich materiałów, z podaniem źródła pozyskania informacji.
8+ai_tool_treatment: WUT recommendations say generative AI systems may support education and other university work, but users are responsible for how GenAI-generated content is used and are advised to verify and critically assess AI-generated materials.
9+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): Podobnie jak inne narzędzia technologiczne systemy generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji mogą służyć wsparciu procesu kształcenia, zdobywania wiedzy i umiejętności.
10+teaching: WUT recommendations advise instructors to consider adding information to course regulations on whether and how GenAI systems may be used, and state that instructors or supervisors may directly prohibit GenAI use for work such as tests, exams, or expert opinions.
11+Evidence (pl, 4c2f60bc9204): Rekomenduje się, aby nauczyciele akademiccy i inni prowadzący zajęcia rozważyli wprowadzenie do regulaminów przedmiotów informacji czy i w jaki sposób systemy generatywnej sztucznej inteligencji mogą być wykorzystywane.
12+academic_integrity: An official WUT news item says each diploma thesis created at WUT is automatically checked through the national anti-plagiarism system and USOS/APD for both plagiarism and use of artificial intelligence.
13+Evidence (pl, 02a482f5ff2f): Każda praca dyplomowa, która powstała na Politechnice Warszawskiej, jest automatycznie sprawdzana zarówno pod kątem plagiatu (to narzędzie znane od lat), jak i wykorzystania sztucznej inteligencji (nowa funkcjonalność).

Claim changes

6 claim records

source_status

Warsaw University of Technology has central Polish-language recommendations on the use of generative AI, attached to a March 2024 Senate position and later identified by a November 2024 Senate position as an integral part of WUT research-policy materials.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence2Languagespl

privacy

WUT recommendations say users may not provide personal data, sensitive data, or other non-public information in prompts to GenAI systems, except for systems that do not share information with third parties, and should ensure generated-content use does not infringe third-party copyright.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagespl

academic_integrity

WUT recommendations say students, doctoral students, academic staff, and administrative staff are not authors of content generated by GenAI tools, so such materials must be clearly marked with the source of information, and GenAI should be used consistently with scientific integrity and good academic practice.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence2Languagespl

ai_tool_treatment

WUT recommendations say generative AI systems may support education and other university work, but users are responsible for how GenAI-generated content is used and are advised to verify and critically assess AI-generated materials.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagespl

teaching

WUT recommendations advise instructors to consider adding information to course regulations on whether and how GenAI systems may be used, and state that instructors or supervisors may directly prohibit GenAI use for work such as tests, exams, or expert opinions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagespl

academic_integrity

An official WUT news item says each diploma thesis created at WUT is automatically checked through the national anti-plagiarism system and USOS/APD for both plagiarism and use of artificial intelligence.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagespl

Source snapshots

4 source attributions