Krakow, Poland

Jagiellonian University

Jagiellonian University is listed as QS 2026 rank =303. Jagiellonian University has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

Jagiellonian University is listed as QS 2026 rank =303. Jagiellonian University has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Jagiellonian University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/jagiellonian-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage3 reviewedSource languageplPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/jagiellonian-university.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence80%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

Jagiellonian University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

Jagiellonian University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.

Conditionally AllowedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Jagiellonian University students must follow instructor AI-tool rules and clearly mark parts of coursework, theses, or other assignments generated with AI-based tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: student_ai_use_disclosure_required

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Osoby kształcące się na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim są zobowiązane: respektować zasady korzystania z narzędzi opartych na SI ... wyraźnie oznaczać te części pracy, które zostały wygenerowane z wykorzystaniem narzędzi opartych na SI

Localized display only

Students are obliged to follow AI-tool rules and clearly mark parts of work generated using AI-based tools.

Ai Tool Treatment

Jagiellonian University permits students and teaching staff to use AI-based tools in teaching activities, subject to the principles in Rector Ordinance No. 115/2025.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: permitted_with_conditions

Original evidence

Evidence 1
W działalności dydaktycznej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego dopuszcza się stosowanie narzędzi opartych na SI przez osoby kształcące się oraz osoby prowadzące zajęcia dydaktyczne.

Localized display only

In Jagiellonian University teaching activities, AI-based tools are permitted for learners and teaching staff, subject to stated principles.

Teaching

Jagiellonian University teaching staff should define transparent course rules for use of AI-based tools in the syllabus and communicate them at the first class.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: instructors_should_define_course_ai_rules

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Osoba prowadząca zajęcia dydaktyczne na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim powinna: określić w sylabusie ... oraz przekazać uczestnikom na pierwszych zajęciach ... transparentne zasady korzystania z narzędzi opartych na SI

Localized display only

Teaching staff should define AI-tool rules in the syllabus and communicate transparent rules at the first class.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities