Policy presence
Gdańsk University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Gdańsk, Poland
Gdańsk University of Technology
Gdańsk University of Technology has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 3 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
Gdańsk University of Technology AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Gdańsk University of Technology has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 3 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Gdańsk University of Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Gdańsk University of Technology as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/gdansk-university-of-technology.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Gdańsk University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Gdańsk University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Gdańsk University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
Gdańsk University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Gdańsk University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Gdańsk University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Gdańsk University of Technology's education-process GenAI guidance says students may use advanced GenAI tools during coursework when the use is documented.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_may_use_advanced_genai_tools_if_documented
Original evidence
Evidence 1During the course of the course, students may use advanced GenAI tools, and such use is documented.
Localized display only
During coursework, students may use advanced GenAI tools, with the use documented.
Academic Integrity
Gdańsk University of Technology's education-process GenAI guidance says opinions and arguments in work submitted for assessment must reflect the student's own knowledge, and teachers have the right to verify independence through an additional interview.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assessed_work_must_reflect_student_own_knowledge_teacher_may_verify
Original evidence
Evidence 1Any opinion and argument presented in the work submitted for assessment must reflect the student's own knowledge. The teacher has the right to verify the degree of independence of the student's work by conducting an additional interview on the work to determine the level of independence.
Localized display only
Assessed work must reflect the student's own knowledge; the teacher may verify independence through an additional interview.
Academic Integrity
For GenAI tools with a potentially high degree of interference, Gdańsk University of Technology's education guidelines provide a student statement identifying the tools and work excerpts and confirming critical analysis and verification of generated content.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: high_interference_genai_use_disclosure_statement
Original evidence
Evidence 1I have used / have used the following tools with a potentially high degree of interference, and I have critically analysed and verified the content generated using GenAI. [excerpt of work (pages from-to) and name of tool, list or table]
Localized display only
For high-interference GenAI tools, the guideline provides a disclosure statement naming tools/work excerpts and confirming critical analysis and verification.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
GenAI | Gdańsk University of Technology
cne.pg.edu.pl
Nowe wytyczne GenAI w procesie kształcenia na PG | Centrum Nowoczesnej Edukacji PG
cne.pg.edu.pl
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.