academic_integrity
The University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards treat content generated with natural-language processing tools and other AI algorithms as non-author content that must be clearly marked.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of Wroclaw
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Wroclaw currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 21, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
University of Wroclaw current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+10-0
11 # University of Wroclaw AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: The University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards treat content generated with natural-language processing tools and other AI algorithms as non-author content that must be clearly marked.
3+Evidence (pl, 1a091490ea63): Niezbędne jest prawidłowe oznaczanie tradycyjnych źródeł bibliograficznych oraz innych treści, które nie są naszego autorstwa, w szczególności wygenerowanych przy użyciu narzędzi komputerowych służących do przetwarzania języka naturalnego oraz innych algorytmów sztucznej inteligencji.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Under the University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards, instructors may permit AI tools for class work on specified terms, and students must acknowledge the AI use in the text or code when such use is allowed.
5+Evidence (pl, 1a091490ea63): Wykładowcy mogą dopuścić użycie m.in. narzędzi sztucznej inteligencji w ramach prowadzonych zajęć w określony sposób i na określonych warunkach, co powinno być zawsze wyraźnie zaznaczone w regulaminie zajęć i/lub w sylabusie.
6+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team says AI tools may be used in research work for theses or term papers within arrangements with the supervisor or adviser, but their use must be ancillary and must not replace the author's critical thinking.
7+Evidence (pl, 86376f47d4b3): W ramach ustaleń z promotorem/opiekunem pracy możliwe jest wykorzystanie narzędzi AI w pracy badawczej. Działanie AI nie może jednak nigdy zastępować krytycznego myślenia autora.
8+academic_integrity: The 2026 ZWA recommendations say authors are responsible for the final text and should disclose the scope of AI-tool use in their work.
9+Evidence (pl, 86376f47d4b3): Autor zawsze bierze odpowiedzialność za ostateczny kształt tekstu i jest zobowiązany do poinformowania o zakresie wykorzystania narzędzi AI w swojej pracy.
10+academic_integrity: The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team FAQ tells students that all AI-tool use in university work must be agreed with the instructor or supervisor, and that AI should not be treated as a generator that creates a thesis instead of the student.
11+Evidence (pl, b647846e8dc2): Wykorzystanie wszystkich narzędzi AI w pracy uniwersyteckiej musi być uzgodnione z prowadzącym lub promotorem. Nie można postrzegać AI jako generatora tworzącego pracę zamiast studenta.
Claim changes
5 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
Under the University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards, instructors may permit AI tools for class work on specified terms, and students must acknowledge the AI use in the text or code when such use is allowed.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team says AI tools may be used in research work for theses or term papers within arrangements with the supervisor or adviser, but their use must be ancillary and must not replace the author's critical thinking.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
The 2026 ZWA recommendations say authors are responsible for the final text and should disclose the scope of AI-tool use in their work.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team FAQ tells students that all AI-tool use in university work must be agreed with the instructor or supervisor, and that AI should not be treated as a generator that creates a thesis instead of the student.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
FAQ - Zespół wsparcia antyplagiatowego UWr
official_guidance checked May 21, 2026
Rekomendacje ZWA w sprawie oznaczania wykorzystania AI w pracach dyplomowych i zaliczeniowych
official_guidance checked May 21, 2026
Uchwała nr 1/2024 UKJK w sprawie standardów uczciwości akademickiej
official_pdf checked May 21, 2026