academic_integrity
The University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards treat content generated with natural-language processing tools and other AI algorithms as non-author content that must be clearly marked.
变更日志
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
当前收录 5 条主张、3 个官方来源。
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of Wroclaw。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站不提供法律或学术诚信建议;除链接指向大学官方页面的来源外,本站内容不代表大学官方声明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
仅展示已记录且 Claim ID 精确匹配的文字对照。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前条款记录:5 条。
The University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards treat content generated with natural-language processing tools and other AI algorithms as non-author content that must be clearly marked.
Under the University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards, instructors may permit AI tools for class work on specified terms, and students must acknowledge the AI use in the text or code when such use is allowed.
The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team says AI tools may be used in research work for theses or term papers within arrangements with the supervisor or adviser, but their use must be ancillary and must not replace the author's critical thinking.
The 2026 ZWA recommendations say authors are responsible for the final text and should disclose the scope of AI-tool use in their work.
The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team FAQ tells students that all AI-tool use in university work must be agreed with the instructor or supervisor, and that AI should not be treated as a generator that creates a thesis instead of the student.
官方来源记录:3 条。
official_guidance 本站检查时间 2026年5月21日 02:09
official_guidance 本站检查时间 2026年5月21日 02:06
official_pdf 本站检查时间 2026年5月21日 02:10