Policy presence
University of Florida has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Gainesville, United States
University of Florida
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
University of Florida has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Florida has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Florida has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University of Florida has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Florida has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Florida has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Florida has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Florida has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Florida has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
University of Florida has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
UF AI guidance says users should use UF-approved or UF-provided tools for sensitive or restricted data and says restricted or sensitive data is not permitted with cloud models tagged External in NaviGator Chat.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Use UF-approved or UF-provided tools for sensitive/restricted data; restricted or sensitive data is not permitted with External-tagged cloud models in NaviGator Chat.
Original evidence
Evidence 1only use UF-approved or UF-provided tools to protect sensitive or restricted data
Localized display only
The page says to only use UF-approved or UF-provided tools for sensitive or restricted data.
Research
UF AI research guidance says researchers must obtain UF Institutional Review Board approval before conducting human-subject research that involves AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: UF IRB approval required before human-subject research involving AI.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers must obtain UF's Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval before conducting human subject research that involves AI.
Localized display only
UF says researchers must obtain UF IRB approval before human-subject research involving AI.
Teaching
UF guidance presents AI-Permitted, Some AI, and No AI as general course-level approaches for instructors to communicate generative AI expectations in syllabi or assignment instructions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: General course AI-use approaches: AI-Permitted, Some AI, No AI.
Original evidence
Evidence 1The following considerations are not formal statements or policies, but general approaches that may help address AI in your course.
Localized display only
The source frames AI-Permitted, Some AI, and No AI as general approaches, not formal policy statements.
Academic Integrity
University of Florida AI guidance says users should not assume AI detection tools are reliable proof of misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Don’t: assume AI detection tools are reliable proof of misconduct.
Localized display only
The UF guidance lists as a “Don’t” that users should not assume AI detection tools are reliable proof of misconduct.
Academic Integrity
University of Florida AI guidance says AI use should be cited or disclosed when required, and students are responsible for citing generative AI assistance in submissions according to academic-integrity guidelines.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do: cite or disclose AI use when required.
Localized display only
The UF guidance says users should cite or disclose AI use when required; the student section separately states that coursework uses of generative AI should be cited in submissions according to academic-integrity guidelines.
Security Review
University of Florida AI guidance says users should not use unapproved AI applications that have not gone through UF risk assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Don’t: use unapproved AI applications that have not gone through UF risk assessment.
Localized display only
The UF guidance lists as a “Don’t” that users should not use unapproved AI applications that have not gone through UF risk assessment.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
Guidelines for Use of AI at UF
ai.ufl.edu
Guidelines for Use of AI at UF
ai.ufl.edu