Talence, France

University of Bordeaux

University of Bordeaux is listed as QS 2026 rank =494. University of Bordeaux has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

University of Bordeaux is listed as QS 2026 rank =494. University of Bordeaux has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Bordeaux as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-bordeaux.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage3 reviewedSource languagefrPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-bordeaux.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources3

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

University of Bordeaux has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

University of Bordeaux has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

University of Bordeaux's 2024 exam charter says unmentioned use of any AI tool such as ChatGPT is prohibited for written or oral work, except for teacher-supervised pedagogical use, and may be treated as fraud.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: ai_use_without_explicit_mention_prohibited_except_teacher_supervised_pedagogical_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
L’utilisation sans mention explicite de tout outil ayant recours à l’intelligence artificielle (par exemple : ChatGPT) est, à l’exception d’un usage pédagogique encadré par un enseignant, interdite lors de la production de tous travaux écrits ou oraux de toute nature. Le non-respect de ces dispositions constitue une fraude susceptible d’être sanctionnée.

Localized display only

The charter prohibits use without explicit mention of any AI tool, such as ChatGPT, for written or oral work, except teacher-supervised pedagogical use, and says non-compliance may be fraud.

Teaching

University of Bordeaux provides a public teaching-support page with generative AI resources for its teaching community.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: public_iag_teaching_resources

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Pour accompagner ces évolutions et répondre à ces questions, l’Université de Bordeaux met à disposition de la communauté enseignante une série de ressources pédagogiques permettant de clarifier le fonctionnement des outils d’IAg comme ChatGPT, leurs apports et leurs limites, et d’éclairer leurs usages pédagogiques.

Localized display only

The university says it makes pedagogical resources available to the teaching community to clarify how generative AI tools such as ChatGPT work, their benefits and limits, and their pedagogical uses.

Teaching

A University of Bordeaux MAPI teaching resource frames generative AI use across three teaching scenarios: discourage use, tolerate use, or deliberately integrate use in a pedagogical setting.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: teaching_guidance_discourage_tolerate_integrate_iag

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Mon contexte d'enseignement exige-t-il de décourager au maximum l'utilisation d'outils d'IAg par mes étudiants ? Ou au contraire d'intégrer ces outils dans le cadre de nouvelles activités pédagogiques ?

Localized display only

The resource frames the decision as whether the teaching context requires discouraging student use of generative AI tools or integrating them into new pedagogical activities.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities