Talence, France

University of Bordeaux

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage3 reviewedEvidence-backed claims3Reviewed3Candidate0Official sources3Source languagefrPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-bordeaux.json

Policy profile

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

University of Bordeaux has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

University of Bordeaux has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

University of Bordeaux's 2024 exam charter says unmentioned use of any AI tool such as ChatGPT is prohibited for written or oral work, except for teacher-supervised pedagogical use, and may be treated as fraud.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: ai_use_without_explicit_mention_prohibited_except_teacher_supervised_pedagogical_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
L’utilisation sans mention explicite de tout outil ayant recours à l’intelligence artificielle (par exemple : ChatGPT) est, à l’exception d’un usage pédagogique encadré par un enseignant, interdite lors de la production de tous travaux écrits ou oraux de toute nature. Le non-respect de ces dispositions constitue une fraude susceptible d’être sanctionnée.

Localized display only

The charter prohibits use without explicit mention of any AI tool, such as ChatGPT, for written or oral work, except teacher-supervised pedagogical use, and says non-compliance may be fraud.

Teaching

University of Bordeaux provides a public teaching-support page with generative AI resources for its teaching community.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: public_iag_teaching_resources

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Pour accompagner ces évolutions et répondre à ces questions, l’Université de Bordeaux met à disposition de la communauté enseignante une série de ressources pédagogiques permettant de clarifier le fonctionnement des outils d’IAg comme ChatGPT, leurs apports et leurs limites, et d’éclairer leurs usages pédagogiques.

Localized display only

The university says it makes pedagogical resources available to the teaching community to clarify how generative AI tools such as ChatGPT work, their benefits and limits, and their pedagogical uses.

Teaching

A University of Bordeaux MAPI teaching resource frames generative AI use across three teaching scenarios: discourage use, tolerate use, or deliberately integrate use in a pedagogical setting.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: teaching_guidance_discourage_tolerate_integrate_iag

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Mon contexte d'enseignement exige-t-il de décourager au maximum l'utilisation d'outils d'IAg par mes étudiants ? Ou au contraire d'intégrer ces outils dans le cadre de nouvelles activités pédagogiques ?

Localized display only

The resource frames the decision as whether the teaching context requires discouraging student use of generative AI tools or integrating them into new pedagogical activities.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities