Policy presence
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Tarragona, Spain
Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 19, 2026.
Universitat Rovira i Virgili AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 19, 2026. Discovery context: Universitat Rovira i Virgili is listed as QS 2026 rank 771-780.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universitat Rovira i Virgili as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 19, 2026 and last changed on May 19, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-rovira-i-virgili.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Academic integrity
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Approved tools
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Named AI services
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.
Teaching guidance
Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
URV's student guide treats AI use in coursework as valid and recommended when it supports learning, while telling students to use it with teacher consent, declare its use, cite it, and verify AI-generated information.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_ai_use_with_consent_disclosure_citation_verification
Original evidence
Evidence 1Fer servir l'IA en els treballs que t'encarreguen en les assignatures és una pràctica vàlida i recomanable
Localized display only
Using AI in coursework is a valid and recommended practice.
Academic Integrity
URV's assessment guidance warns about academic-fraud concerns from AI but advises evolving assessment design rather than relying on AI-detection tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assessment_guidance_deemphasizes_ai_detectors
Original evidence
Evidence 1aquestes presenten una sèrie d'inconvenients que ens condueix a no fer-les servir
Localized display only
These tools present drawbacks that lead us not to use them.
Teaching
URV's curriculum guidance says AI should be integrated into the curriculum to prepare students for professional contexts, including discussion of ethical and social implications such as data protection and academic integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: curriculum_ai_ethics_data_protection_academic_integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1Cal integrar la IA en el currículum per a formar els estudiants per a una societat en què la IA s'incorpora cada dia més
Localized display only
AI should be integrated into the curriculum to train students for a society where AI is increasingly present.
Teaching
URV's Campus Virtual guidance for teaching staff frames generative AI as something to integrate into teaching and learning rather than prohibit, offering initial ideas for URV lecturers.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teaching_staff_guidance_integrate_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1prohibir ChatGPT i altres productes d'IA no tindria sentit. És per això que cal integrar-los en la nostra formació
Localized display only
Prohibiting ChatGPT and other AI products would not make sense; therefore, they should be integrated into training.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Afectacions de la IA en el currículum. - Campus Virtual URV - Ajuda
docs.campusvirtual.urv.cat
IA i aprenentatge. Una guia per l'estudiant URV. - Campus Virtual URV - Ajuda
docs.campusvirtual.urv.cat
IA i docència. Una guia pel professorat URV. - Campus Virtual URV - Ajuda
docs.campusvirtual.urv.cat
Impacte de la IA en l'avaluació. - Campus Virtual URV - Ajuda
docs.campusvirtual.urv.cat
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.