Tarragona, Spain

Universitat Rovira i Virgili

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources4Source languagecaPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-rovira-i-virgili.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

AI disclosure

Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

Universitat Rovira i Virgili has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Ai Tool Treatment

URV's student guide treats AI use in coursework as valid and recommended when it supports learning, while telling students to use it with teacher consent, declare its use, cite it, and verify AI-generated information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: student_ai_use_with_consent_disclosure_citation_verification

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Fer servir l'IA en els treballs que t'encarreguen en les assignatures és una pràctica vàlida i recomanable

Localized display only

Using AI in coursework is a valid and recommended practice.

Academic Integrity

URV's assessment guidance warns about academic-fraud concerns from AI but advises evolving assessment design rather than relying on AI-detection tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: assessment_guidance_deemphasizes_ai_detectors

Original evidence

Evidence 1
aquestes presenten una sèrie d'inconvenients que ens condueix a no fer-les servir

Localized display only

These tools present drawbacks that lead us not to use them.

Teaching

URV's curriculum guidance says AI should be integrated into the curriculum to prepare students for professional contexts, including discussion of ethical and social implications such as data protection and academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: curriculum_ai_ethics_data_protection_academic_integrity

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Cal integrar la IA en el currículum per a formar els estudiants per a una societat en què la IA s'incorpora cada dia més

Localized display only

AI should be integrated into the curriculum to train students for a society where AI is increasingly present.

Teaching

URV's Campus Virtual guidance for teaching staff frames generative AI as something to integrate into teaching and learning rather than prohibit, offering initial ideas for URV lecturers.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: teaching_staff_guidance_integrate_ai

Original evidence

Evidence 1
prohibir ChatGPT i altres productes d'IA no tindria sentit. És per això que cal integrar-los en la nostra formació

Localized display only

Prohibiting ChatGPT and other AI products would not make sense; therefore, they should be integrated into training.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 19, 2026Last changedMay 19, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities