Change log

Universitat Rovira i Virgili

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Universitat Rovira i Virgili currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 19, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Universitat Rovira i Virgili current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+8-0
11 # Universitat Rovira i Virgili AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: URV's student guide treats AI use in coursework as valid and recommended when it supports learning, while telling students to use it with teacher consent, declare its use, cite it, and verify AI-generated information.
3+Evidence (ca, d34980be43ed): Fer servir l'IA en els treballs que t'encarreguen en les assignatures és una pràctica vàlida i recomanable
4+academic_integrity: URV's assessment guidance warns about academic-fraud concerns from AI but advises evolving assessment design rather than relying on AI-detection tools.
5+Evidence (ca, 21940cd44bbf): aquestes presenten una sèrie d'inconvenients que ens condueix a no fer-les servir
6+teaching: URV's curriculum guidance says AI should be integrated into the curriculum to prepare students for professional contexts, including discussion of ethical and social implications such as data protection and academic integrity.
7+Evidence (ca, dbaf11f5d661): Cal integrar la IA en el currículum per a formar els estudiants per a una societat en què la IA s'incorpora cada dia més
8+teaching: URV's Campus Virtual guidance for teaching staff frames generative AI as something to integrate into teaching and learning rather than prohibit, offering initial ideas for URV lecturers.
9+Evidence (ca, 043f62ac73a7): prohibir ChatGPT i altres productes d'IA no tindria sentit. És per això que cal integrar-los en la nostra formació

Claim changes

4 claim records

teaching

URV's curriculum guidance says AI should be integrated into the curriculum to prepare students for professional contexts, including discussion of ethical and social implications such as data protection and academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesca

ai_tool_treatment

URV's student guide treats AI use in coursework as valid and recommended when it supports learning, while telling students to use it with teacher consent, declare its use, cite it, and verify AI-generated information.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesca

academic_integrity

URV's assessment guidance warns about academic-fraud concerns from AI but advises evolving assessment design rather than relying on AI-detection tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesca

teaching

URV's Campus Virtual guidance for teaching staff frames generative AI as something to integrate into teaching and learning rather than prohibit, offering initial ideas for URV lecturers.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesca

Source snapshots

4 source attributions