Policy presence
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Barcelona, Spain
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) is listed as QS 2026 rank =265. Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) is listed as QS 2026 rank =265. Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universitat-pompeu-fabra.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Gemini.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
UPF's instruction says students who include AI-generated text, code, images, or similar fragments must identify them and cite the source used to generate them.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_fragments_must_be_identified_and_cited
Original evidence
Evidence 1En tot cas, sempre que l’estudiant inclogui fragments de text, codi, imatge, etc. generats per IAG ha d’identificar-los i citar correctament la font que s’ha emprat per generar-los.
Localized display only
UPF says students must identify AI-generated fragments and correctly cite the source used to generate them.
Academic Integrity
UPF's instruction states that illegitimate, dishonest, or non-permitted use of generative AI in assessable activities is rejected by the university and must be penalized.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: illegitimate_dishonest_or_non_permitted_iag_use_penalized
Original evidence
Evidence 1L’ús il·legítim, deshonest o no permès de la IAG en les activitats avaluables és una actitud reprovable, que la Universitat rebutja, i ha de ser penalitzat.
Localized display only
UPF states that illegitimate, dishonest, or non-permitted AI use in assessable activities is rejected and must be penalized.
Ai Tool Treatment
UPF's instruction treats generative AI tools as resources that students may use legitimately or fraudulently depending on the assessable activity and the instructions received.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: legitimate_or_fraudulent_depending_on_activity_and_instructions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Les eines d’IAG suposen un recurs a l’abast dels estudiants ... els estudiants en poden fer un ús legítim, o bé un ús fraudulent o deshonest, en funció del tipus d’activitat avaluable i de les instruccions que han rebut per elaborar-la.
Localized display only
UPF frames generative AI as a student-accessible resource whose legitimate or dishonest use depends on the activity and instructions.
Ai Tool Treatment
UPF's BibTIC guide says the university provides Gemini and NotebookLM as licensed generative AI tools for the university community.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: licensed_gemini_and_notebooklm_for_university_community
Original evidence
Evidence 1La UPF proporciona a la comunitat universitària dues eines d’IAG desenvolupades per Google: Gemini i NotebookLM.
Localized display only
UPF says it provides Gemini and NotebookLM as Google generative AI tools for the university community.
Privacy
UPF's BibTIC guide says using Gemini and NotebookLM with a UPF Google Workspace account provides confidentiality and prevents entered information from being used to train the same AI model.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: licensed_google_iag_confidentiality_no_training_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Aquestes dues eines, si les utilitzes havent-te autenticat amb el compte de Google Workspace de la UPF ... Confidencialitat i protecció de la informació que hi introdueixis: no es farà servir per entrenar cap model de la mateixa IAG.
Localized display only
UPF says the licensed tools, when used with a UPF Google Workspace account, provide confidentiality and do not use entered information to train the same AI model.
Teaching
UPF's Library/CRAI guide gives recommendations and examples for using generative AI tools in teaching and in the preparation of academic work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: library_crai_generative_ai_teaching_academic_work_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1La Biblioteca/CRAI ha elaborado una guía sobre Inteligencia artificial: herramientas para la docencia y el aprendizaje ... tanto en la docencia y en la detección de su uso, como en la elaboración de trabajos académicos.
Localized display only
UPF says its Library/CRAI guide covers generative AI tools for teaching, detecting use, and preparing academic work.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Cómo utilizar herramientas de inteligencia artificial generativa (IAG) en la docencia y los trabajos académicos
upf.edu
Eines d’IAG - Intel·ligència artificial generativa - Guies BibTIC
guiesbibtic.upf.edu
Ús de la intel·ligència artificial: avaluació i integritat acadèmica
seuelectronica.upf.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.