São Paulo, Brazil

Universidade Federal de São Paulo

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

For final documents submitted for evaluation at Unifesp or sent for publication, the generative-AI guidelines require an explicit declaration about the use of generative AI tools, including how the tool was used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: Explicit IAG-use declaration required for final evaluated or publication-submitted documents.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Como parte das diretrizes, o documento estabelece a obrigatoriedade de incluir uma declaração explícita sobre o uso de ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial Generativa em todos os documentos finais submetidos à avaliação na Unifesp ou encaminhados para publicação.

Localized display only

The guidelines establish a requirement to include an explicit declaration about use of generative AI tools in all final documents submitted for evaluation at Unifesp or sent for publication.

Research

Unifesp's Resolution 17/2025 establishes guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in research and postgraduate work, with the stated aim of responsible and transparent use in scientific and academic production.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Resolution 17/2025 covers generative AI use in Unifesp research and postgraduate work.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Foi aprovada no Conselho de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa (CPGPq) da Unifesp a Resolução nº 17/2025, que estabelece as diretrizes para uso de Inteligência Artificial Generativa (IAG) na pesquisa e na pós-graduação da instituição.

Localized display only

Unifesp's Postgraduate and Research Council approved Resolution 17/2025, establishing guidelines for generative AI use in research and postgraduate work.

Academic Integrity

Unifesp states that researchers are responsible for critically reviewing texts, results, code, or images produced by generative-AI systems for correctness, coherence, originality, citation/reference compliance, and intellectual-property respect.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Researchers retain critical review responsibility for IAG-generated outputs.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Caberá ao(à) pesquisador(a) revisar criticamente todos os textos, resultados, códigos ou imagens produzidos por sistemas de IAG, garantindo a correção, coerência e originalidade, atentando-se às normas de citação e referência, bem como ao respeito à propriedade intelectual.

Localized display only

Researchers are responsible for critically reviewing IAG-produced texts, results, code, or images for correctness, coherence, originality, citation/reference norms, and intellectual-property respect.

Academic Integrity

The EPE postgraduate chamber page asks students, in light of Resolution 17/2025, to sign the PROPGPQ AI-use declaration via Gov.br and include it in the SEI process for the Unifesp institutional repository.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: EPE page asks students to sign the AI-use declaration via Gov.br and include it in the SEI repository process.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Solicitamos que o documento seja assinado via Gov.br (tutorial aqui) e incluído no processo SEI do tipo PROPGPQ: Repositório Institucional Unifesp.

Localized display only

The page asks that the document be signed via Gov.br and included in the SEI process of type PROPGPQ: Unifesp Institutional Repository.

Source record

Official sources

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence92%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universidade Federal de São Paulo AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 20, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universidade-federal-de-sao-paulo

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log