Policy presence
Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG) has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Source Status
UFMG has an official recommendations document on the use of artificial intelligence tools in academic activities.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official_ai_recommendations_document
Original evidence
Evidence 1Este documento apresenta um primeiro esforço da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais em refletir, institucionalmente, sobre esse contexto.
Localized display only
The document says it is UFMG's first institutional effort to reflect on this context.
Teaching
UFMG's AI recommendations suggest that course syllabi should be transparent about what AI-tool use is authorized and what is not permitted.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: syllabi_ai_use_transparency_recommended
Original evidence
Evidence 1Recomendar que ementas de disciplinas sejam transparentes na explicitação do que é autorizado e do que não é permitido em termos de uso de ferramentas de IA.
Localized display only
The recommendations call for syllabi to be transparent about what AI-tool use is authorized and what is not permitted.
Research
For research, UFMG's AI recommendations include identifying in articles and technical reports the stages of the research process carried out with AI assistance.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_assistance_disclosure_recommended
Original evidence
Evidence 1Identificar em artigos e relatórios técnicos as etapas do processo de pesquisa realizadas com auxílio de IA.
Localized display only
The document recommends identifying in articles and technical reports the stages of research carried out with AI assistance.
Academic Integrity
UFMG's recommendations state that students using AI tools should ensure submitted work reflects their own analysis and intellectual creation, not a full or partial copy of AI-generated output.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_ai_output_copying_caution
Original evidence
Evidence 1O aluno, ao fazer uso de ferramentas de IA, deve tomar cuidado e garantir que o resultado entregue seja fruto de seu próprio trabalho, decorrente de sua análise e criação intelectual, e não uma mera cópia integral ou parcial daquilo que foi gerado pelas ferramentas empregadas.
Localized display only
Students using AI tools are told to ensure submitted work is their own analysis and intellectual creation rather than a full or partial copy of AI-generated output.
Teaching
UFMG's AI recommendations include seminars, events, training, and AI-literacy activities for UFMG audiences.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_training_and_literacy_recommended
Original evidence
Evidence 1Realizar seminários, eventos e treinamentos para os diversos públicos da UFMG em torno do uso de IA no espaço acadêmico. Estimular atividades de letramento em IA para divulgação ampla na UFMG.
Localized display only
The document recommends seminars, events, training, and AI-literacy activities for UFMG audiences.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
1 source attribution
Recomendações para o Uso de Ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial nas Atividades Acadêmicas na UFMG
ufmg.br