University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

São Paulo, Brazil

Universidade de São Paulo

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 108UpdatedMay 14, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

4 reviewed claims

Teaching

A FDUSP generative AI governance report recommends mitigation measures including training and disclosure, review of generated content, transparency about use, and avoiding prompts containing personal data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: FDUSP report recommends training/disclosure, review, transparency, and avoiding personal data in prompts.

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
A forma de mitigar tais riscos está na adoção de medidas de governança, por meio de (i) treinamento e divulgação para esclarecimento quanto aos usos adequados e inadequados da ferramenta; (ii) revisão do conteúdo gerado, de forma a garantir sua acurácia e mitigar a presença de vieses discriminatórios; (iii) transparência em seu uso; e (iv) evitar requisições que contenham dados pessoais

Localized display only

The report frames mitigation as governance measures: training/disclosure, review of generated content, transparency about use, and avoiding prompts with personal data.

Source language
pt-BR
Snapshot hash
c57e7156…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Executive summary

Academic Integrity

The FDUSP report says lack of transparency about student use of generative AI in faculty academic work points to a need for faculty actions promoting awareness and rules or guidelines for transparent and ethical use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: FDUSP report identifies transparency concerns and need for faculty actions/rules.

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Essa falta de transparência é preocupante, por dificultar processos internos de revisão e correção dos trabalhos e atividades acadêmicas. Esse fato, aliado a dúvidas quanto à legitimidade e à legalidade do uso, apontam para a necessidade de ações pela faculdade para promover a conscientização e a criação de regras e diretrizes que promovam a transparência e o uso ético das IAGs.

Localized display only

The report says transparency gaps in faculty academic work create a need for faculty actions, awareness, and rules or guidelines for transparent and ethical IAG use.

Source language
pt-BR
Snapshot hash
c57e7156…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Executive summary

Source Status

An IEA-USP report says a USP seminar initiated debates for proposals to be sent to the USP Rector's Office so it could define guidelines and norms for appropriate and ethical use of tools such as ChatGPT in teaching and research.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence80%

Normalized value: IEA-USP reports proposal process, not enacted policy.

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
O seminário deu início a uma série de debates para a elaboração de propostas a serem encaminhadas à Reitoria da USP, para que esta defina um conjunto de diretrizes e normas que asseguram o uso adequado e ético de ferramentas como ChatGPT no ensino e na pesquisa.

Localized display only

IEA-USP says the seminar began debates for proposals to the USP Rector's Office about guidelines and norms for appropriate and ethical use of ChatGPT-like tools.

Source language
pt-BR
Snapshot hash
fde9ec32…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Article body, seminar overview

Ai Tool Treatment

An ABCD-USP article says USP's direction includes ethics and integrity formation, writing development, and broader use of plagiarism/similarity platforms such as Turnitin and Crossref Similarity Check iThenticate, which the article says USP has subscribed to since 2016 through ABCD-USP.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%

Normalized value: ABCD-USP describes Turnitin and iThenticate availability/subscription context.

Last checked
May 14, 2026
Last changed
May 14, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
O caminho na Universidade de São Paulo já tem uma direção e ela passa pela formação dos estudantes com ênfase na ética e na integridade, investimento no aprimoramento da escrita e redação científica e acadêmica, ampliação do uso de plataformas de prevenção de plágio como o Turnitin por docentes em conjunto com as bibliotecas... Ambas as ferramentas são assinadas pela USP desde 2016 por meio da Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (ABCD-USP).

Localized display only

ABCD-USP describes an ethics/integrity and writing-development direction and says USP subscribes to Turnitin and iThenticate through ABCD-USP.

Source language
pt-BR
Snapshot hash
0d1321df…
Retrieved
May 14, 2026
Evidence locator
Article body near closing section

Source record

Official sources

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence86%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universidade de São Paulo AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 14, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universidade-de-sao-paulo

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log