Campinas, Brazil

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) is listed as QS 2026 rank =233. Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) is listed as QS 2026 rank =233. Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universidade-estadual-de-campinas.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage5 reviewedSource languagept-BRPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universidade-estadual-de-campinas.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Research claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Privacy and data entry

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

Unicamp's generative AI deliberation says AI use must observe information security, personal-data protection, confidentiality, intellectual property, and ethical standards, and it forbids entering personal, sensitive, or confidential information into tools that are not institutionally offered or recommended by Unicamp or that do not meet the university's information-security guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: data protection and confidentiality restrictions for generative AI tools

Original evidence

Evidence 1
§ 1º – O uso de IA Generativa na Unicamp deve observar e atender os aspectos relacionados à segurança da informação, proteção de dados pessoais, confidencialidade... Artigo 4º – É vedado... I – Inserir informações pessoais, sensíveis ou confidenciais em ferramentas de IA Generativa que não sejam oferecidas ou recomendadas institucionalmente pela Unicamp...

Academic Integrity

Unicamp's generative AI deliberation says AI use in academic works, reports, articles, administrative documents, or any other intellectual production must be explicitly declared, and it assigns the user sole and full responsibility for AI-produced content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: explicit AI-use declaration and user responsibility

Original evidence

Evidence 1
O uso da IA Generativa em trabalhos acadêmicos, relatórios, artigos, documentos administrativos ou qualquer outra produção intelectual deve ser declarado explicitamente... Artigo 5º – O usuário de ferramentas de IA Generativa é o único e integral responsável pelo conteúdo produzido...

Ai Tool Treatment

Unicamp's 2026 CONSU deliberation says generative AI use at Unicamp by faculty, technical-administrative staff, students, volunteers, and participants in institutional and academic programs must follow the deliberation's orientations and the principles and objectives in Unicamp's statutes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: university-wide generative AI use governed by CONSU-A-005/2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Artigo 1º – O uso de IA Generativa na Unicamp por servidores docentes e técnico-administrativos, discentes, voluntários e participantes de programas institucionais e acadêmicos da Universidade deve atender aos princípios e objetivos previstos nos Estatutos da Unicamp e às orientações desta Deliberação.

Academic Integrity

Unicamp's generative AI deliberation allows students to use generative AI as support for information seeking, study, and learning, but says assessment activities must observe the limits and conditions defined by the course instructor when assessments exist.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: student generative AI support allowed subject to instructor-defined assessment limits

Original evidence

Evidence 1
sendo admitido o uso de IA Generativa como ferramenta de apoio à busca de informações, ao estudo e ao processo de aprendizagem, desde que, nas atividades de avaliação, quando houver, sejam observados os limites e condições definidos pelo docente responsável pela disciplina;

Research

The Unicamp Scientific Electronic Journals Portal AI-use policy says generative AI use in journal submission, assessment, and editing processes must be declared explicitly at manuscript submission and in the manuscript.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: PPEC journal workflow requires explicit generative AI disclosure

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Esta política estabelece as diretrizes para o uso ético, transparente e responsável de ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial (IA)... nos processos de submissão, avaliação e editoração dos periódicos científicos vinculados à Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP). O uso de ferramentas de IA generativa... deve ser declarado explicitamente no momento da submissão do manuscrito.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities