Policy presence
Universidade de Brasília has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Brasília, Brazil
Universidade de Brasília
Universidade de Brasília has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
Universidade de Brasília AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Universidade de Brasília has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Universidade de Brasília is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universidade de Brasília as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universidade-de-brasilia.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Universidade de Brasília has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Universidade de Brasília has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Universidade de Brasília has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Universidade de Brasília has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Universidade de Brasília has 4 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Universidade de Brasília has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
Universidade de Brasília has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas instructs reviewers not to use generative AI to analyze or summarize submitted articles, and prohibits importing unpublished manuscripts, proposals, files, images, or related information into generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal_reviewers_no_ai_analysis_or_manuscript_import
Original evidence
Evidence 1As(os) pareceristas não devem usar IA generativa para analisar ou resumir artigos submetidos, ou mesmo trechos dos mesmos, como parte de suas revisões. É proibido importar manuscritos não publicados, propostas de projetos ou quaisquer arquivos, imagens ou informações associados para ferramentas de IA generativa.
Localized display only
Reviewers should not use generative AI to analyze or summarize submissions, and importing unpublished manuscripts or associated files into generative AI tools is prohibited.
Academic Integrity
The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas states that generative AI cannot be considered an author, and that only a natural person can take responsibility for and sign the submitted contribution.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal_ai_not_author
Original evidence
Evidence 1As autoras e autores devem revisar e validar todo o conteúdo gerado ou assistido por IA para garantir sua precisão e conformidade com os requisitos científicos e editoriais. A IA generativa não pode, em hipótese alguma, ser considerada autora. Somente uma pessoa física pode assumir a responsabilidade pelo conteúdo submetido e assinar a contribuição.
Localized display only
Authors must review and validate AI-generated or AI-assisted content; generative AI cannot be considered an author, and a natural person must take responsibility.
Academic Integrity
The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas allows generative AI for brainstorming and language improvement, but requires authors to clearly disclose any generative AI use with tool, version, use, and reason information in submission editor notes.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal_authors_ai_allowed_with_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1O uso de ferramentas de IA generativa é permitido como uma técnica para estimular a criatividade (brainstorming) e aprimoramento linguístico, desde que os padrões editoriais da Revista sejam respeitados. Qualquer uso de IA generativa deve ser claramente divulgado no momento da citação: Indique o nome completo da ferramenta, sua versão, como ela é usada e o motivo de seu uso.
Localized display only
Generative AI may be used for brainstorming and language improvement if journal standards are respected; any use must be clearly disclosed with tool name, version, use, and reason.
Academic Integrity
The UnB-hosted journal Sociedade e Estado says it does not currently use AI resources in publication evaluation and editing, and tells authors that any material or content generated by an AI application should be reported in the abstract and methods section or equivalent.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal_no_ai_in_evaluation_authors_disclose_generated_content
Original evidence
Evidence 1Apesar de estudar possíveis formas de adoção, até o presente momento, a S&E não utiliza recursos de IA em seu processo de avaliação e editoração de publicações. Recomenda, no entanto, que os autores e pareceristas sigam as orientações do Guia de uso de ferramentas e recursos de Inteligência Artificial na comunicação de pesquisas na Rede SciELO. Todo e qualquer uso ou conteúdo gerado por uma aplicação de IA deve ser informado no resumo e na seção métodos ou equivalente.
Localized display only
S&E says it does not currently use AI resources in evaluation/editing, recommends SciELO AI guidance, and says AI-generated content should be reported in the abstract and methods or equivalent section.
Academic Integrity
The UnB-hosted Anuario Antropologico author instructions state that the use and type of generative AI should be made explicit in submitted materials for evaluation when applicable, and recommend mentioning any AI-tool use in manuscript preparation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal_author_instructions_disclose_type_of_genai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1O uso e tipo de uso de Inteligência Artificial Generativa deve ser explicitada nas peças submetidas para avaliação, quando for o caso. Tal como explicitado no Guia de Uso de ferramentas e recursos de IA na comunicação de pesquisas na Rede Scielo, “ocultar o uso e conteúdo de IA é uma fala ética que viola os princípios de transparência e honestidade em pesquisa”. Assim, recomenda-se às auroras que mencionem todo e qualquer tipo de uso de ferramentas de IA na elaboração de seu manuscrito.
Localized display only
Use and type of generative AI should be explicit in submitted pieces when applicable; the page recommends mentioning any AI-tool use in manuscript preparation.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Instrucao aos Autores | Anuario Antropologico
periodicos.unb.br
Sobre a Revista | Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas
periodicos.unb.br
Sobre a Revista | Sociedade e Estado
periodicos.unb.br
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.