University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Brasília, Brazil

Universidade de Brasília

Last checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%
Public JSONChange logMonthly reportCitation rulesDataset accessAnalysis JSONSubmit correction
Public JSONCitation rules
More tools

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources3Source languageptPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universidade-de-brasilia.json

Policy profile

Analysis JSONAnalysis review
Coverage score80/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Policy presence

Universidade de Brasília has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-unb-sociedade-ai-disclosure

Privacy and data entry

Universidade de Brasília has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-unb-repam-reviewer-ai-limits

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

Universidade de Brasília has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-unb-repam-reviewer-ai-limits

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Tools directory
Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas instructs reviewers not to use generative AI to analyze or summarize submitted articles, and prohibits importing unpublished manuscripts, proposals, files, images, or related information into generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: journal_reviewers_no_ai_analysis_or_manuscript_import

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
As(os) pareceristas não devem usar IA generativa para analisar ou resumir artigos submetidos, ou mesmo trechos dos mesmos, como parte de suas revisões. É proibido importar manuscritos não publicados, propostas de projetos ou quaisquer arquivos, imagens ou informações associados para ferramentas de IA generativa.

Localized display only

Reviewers should not use generative AI to analyze or summarize submissions, and importing unpublished manuscripts or associated files into generative AI tools is prohibited.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
91cbd2d91678fb18c1a2b3c68f2176f194a4ab758d2134b7d2b3a07dd1436e61
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Politica para o uso de IA generativa por pareceristas da REPAM

Academic Integrity

The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas states that generative AI cannot be considered an author, and that only a natural person can take responsibility for and sign the submitted contribution.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: journal_ai_not_author

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
As autoras e autores devem revisar e validar todo o conteúdo gerado ou assistido por IA para garantir sua precisão e conformidade com os requisitos científicos e editoriais. A IA generativa não pode, em hipótese alguma, ser considerada autora. Somente uma pessoa física pode assumir a responsabilidade pelo conteúdo submetido e assinar a contribuição.

Localized display only

Authors must review and validate AI-generated or AI-assisted content; generative AI cannot be considered an author, and a natural person must take responsibility.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
91cbd2d91678fb18c1a2b3c68f2176f194a4ab758d2134b7d2b3a07dd1436e61
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Responsabilidade e supervisao humana

Academic Integrity

The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas allows generative AI for brainstorming and language improvement, but requires authors to clearly disclose any generative AI use with tool, version, use, and reason information in submission editor notes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: journal_authors_ai_allowed_with_disclosure

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
O uso de ferramentas de IA generativa é permitido como uma técnica para estimular a criatividade (brainstorming) e aprimoramento linguístico, desde que os padrões editoriais da Revista sejam respeitados. Qualquer uso de IA generativa deve ser claramente divulgado no momento da citação: Indique o nome completo da ferramenta, sua versão, como ela é usada e o motivo de seu uso.

Localized display only

Generative AI may be used for brainstorming and language improvement if journal standards are respected; any use must be clearly disclosed with tool name, version, use, and reason.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
91cbd2d91678fb18c1a2b3c68f2176f194a4ab758d2134b7d2b3a07dd1436e61
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Politica para o uso de IA Generativa para autoras e autores da REPAM

Academic Integrity

The UnB-hosted journal Sociedade e Estado says it does not currently use AI resources in publication evaluation and editing, and tells authors that any material or content generated by an AI application should be reported in the abstract and methods section or equivalent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: journal_no_ai_in_evaluation_authors_disclose_generated_content

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Apesar de estudar possíveis formas de adoção, até o presente momento, a S&E não utiliza recursos de IA em seu processo de avaliação e editoração de publicações. Recomenda, no entanto, que os autores e pareceristas sigam as orientações do Guia de uso de ferramentas e recursos de Inteligência Artificial na comunicação de pesquisas na Rede SciELO. Todo e qualquer uso ou conteúdo gerado por uma aplicação de IA deve ser informado no resumo e na seção métodos ou equivalente.

Localized display only

S&E says it does not currently use AI resources in evaluation/editing, recommends SciELO AI guidance, and says AI-generated content should be reported in the abstract and methods or equivalent section.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
e14dd32e9f3e4bb8e26f3c4be406f7962b944a5463ab4aae9982445e582397d7
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Adocao de softwares uso de recursos de Inteligencia Artificial

Academic Integrity

The UnB-hosted Anuario Antropologico author instructions state that the use and type of generative AI should be made explicit in submitted materials for evaluation when applicable, and recommend mentioning any AI-tool use in manuscript preparation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: journal_author_instructions_disclose_type_of_genai_use

Last checked
May 20, 2026
Last changed
May 20, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
O uso e tipo de uso de Inteligência Artificial Generativa deve ser explicitada nas peças submetidas para avaliação, quando for o caso. Tal como explicitado no Guia de Uso de ferramentas e recursos de IA na comunicação de pesquisas na Rede Scielo, “ocultar o uso e conteúdo de IA é uma fala ética que viola os princípios de transparência e honestidade em pesquisa”. Assim, recomenda-se às auroras que mencionem todo e qualquer tipo de uso de ferramentas de IA na elaboração de seu manuscrito.

Localized display only

Use and type of generative AI should be explicit in submitted pieces when applicable; the page recommends mentioning any AI-tool use in manuscript preparation.

Source language
pt
Snapshot hash
12667a2d0ac79669898c29c8f88428c5fbcaf7209c94efcf9c3aa3b713c81eaf
Retrieved
May 20, 2026
Evidence locator
Instrucao aos Autores - integridade em publicacao cientifica

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

3 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Open contribution pathsReview workflow
Back to universities