Change log

Universidade Federal de São Paulo

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Universidade Federal de São Paulo currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Universidade Federal de São Paulo current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Universidade Federal de São Paulo AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: For final documents submitted for evaluation at Unifesp or sent for publication, the generative-AI guidelines require an explicit declaration about the use of generative AI tools, including how the tool was used.
3+Evidence (pt-BR, 75d70061b11a): Como parte das diretrizes, o documento estabelece a obrigatoriedade de incluir uma declaração explícita sobre o uso de ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial Generativa em todos os documentos finais submetidos à avaliação na Unifesp ou encaminhados para publicação.
4+research: Unifesp's Resolution 17/2025 establishes guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in research and postgraduate work, with the stated aim of responsible and transparent use in scientific and academic production.
5+Evidence (pt-BR, 75d70061b11a): Foi aprovada no Conselho de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa (CPGPq) da Unifesp a Resolução nº 17/2025, que estabelece as diretrizes para uso de Inteligência Artificial Generativa (IAG) na pesquisa e na pós-graduação da instituição.
6+academic_integrity: Unifesp states that researchers are responsible for critically reviewing texts, results, code, or images produced by generative-AI systems for correctness, coherence, originality, citation/reference compliance, and intellectual-property respect.
7+Evidence (pt-BR, 75d70061b11a): Caberá ao(à) pesquisador(a) revisar criticamente todos os textos, resultados, códigos ou imagens produzidos por sistemas de IAG, garantindo a correção, coerência e originalidade, atentando-se às normas de citação e referência, bem como ao respeito à propriedade intelectual.
8+academic_integrity: The EPE postgraduate chamber page asks students, in light of Resolution 17/2025, to sign the PROPGPQ AI-use declaration via Gov.br and include it in the SEI process for the Unifesp institutional repository.
9+Evidence (pt-BR, 69be06f99ef9): Solicitamos que o documento seja assinado via Gov.br (tutorial aqui) e incluído no processo SEI do tipo PROPGPQ: Repositório Institucional Unifesp.
10+research: The PPGRI page places the Unifesp generative-AI guidelines and IAG declaration alongside qualification, dissertation, and repository-deposit guidance for its postgraduate students.
11+Evidence (pt-BR, 0cbf6ea07c39): Diretrizes para uso de Inteligência Artificial Generativa na pesquisa e na pós-graduação – Unifesp; Declaração uso IAG; Fluxo para o depósito de teses e dissertações e demais produções bibliográficas apresentadas com finalidade de obtenção de títulos em programas de pós-graduação stricto sensu da Unifesp.

Claim changes

5 claim records

research

The PPGRI page places the Unifesp generative-AI guidelines and IAG declaration alongside qualification, dissertation, and repository-deposit guidance for its postgraduate students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence78%Evidence1Languagespt-BR

academic_integrity

The EPE postgraduate chamber page asks students, in light of Resolution 17/2025, to sign the PROPGPQ AI-use declaration via Gov.br and include it in the SEI process for the Unifesp institutional repository.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagespt-BR

academic_integrity

Unifesp states that researchers are responsible for critically reviewing texts, results, code, or images produced by generative-AI systems for correctness, coherence, originality, citation/reference compliance, and intellectual-property respect.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagespt-BR

academic_integrity

For final documents submitted for evaluation at Unifesp or sent for publication, the generative-AI guidelines require an explicit declaration about the use of generative AI tools, including how the tool was used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagespt-BR

research

Unifesp's Resolution 17/2025 establishes guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in research and postgraduate work, with the stated aim of responsible and transparent use in scientific and academic production.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagespt-BR

Source snapshots

3 source attributions