Antwerp, Belgium
Reviewed record
5 reviewed claims
Onderzoek
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1In addition to verifying the information provided, researchers must acknowledge the use of AI tools in their research. As mentioned earlier, AI tools cannot be listed as authors on a publication.
Onderzoek
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1Key concept: the more responsibility is placed on the AI system, the more human control is required afterwards. The responsibility for the correctness and robustness of information ALWAYS lies with the researcher.
Onderzoek
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1Use to be avoided: Creating the core content of publications or project applications without thorough factchecking and additional substantive editing. Peer review of publications or project applications by others.
Onderwijs
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1AI-proofing betekent dat je een onderwijssituatie creëert waarin studenten geen gebruik kunnen maken van AI, of waarin ze door de mand vallen als ze dat toch doen terwijl het niet is toegestaan.
Gelokaliseerde weergave only
AI-proofing means creating a teaching situation where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed.
Onderwijs
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1This can be done by making your exam questions sufficiently complex and specific, and by going over guidelines with the students beforehand, clarifying whether and how they can/may use AI tools in your open-book exam.
Source record
4 sources
uantwerpen.be
uantwerpen.be
medialibrary.uantwerpen.be
uantwerpen.be
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Antwerp AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-antwerp
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Wijzigingslogboek openen