Antwerp, Belgium

University of Antwerp

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

5 reviewed claims

Recherche

University of Antwerp research AI guidelines state that researchers who use AI tools in their research must acknowledge that use, while AI tools cannot be listed as authors.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
In addition to verifying the information provided, researchers must acknowledge the use of AI tools in their research. As mentioned earlier, AI tools cannot be listed as authors on a publication.

Recherche

University of Antwerp research guidance says that when more responsibility is placed on an AI system, more human control is required, and that researchers remain responsible for correctness and robustness.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Key concept: the more responsibility is placed on the AI system, the more human control is required afterwards. The responsibility for the correctness and robustness of information ALWAYS lies with the researcher.

Recherche

University of Antwerp research AI guidelines identify creating core publication or project-application content without thorough fact-checking and substantive editing, and peer review of others' publications or project applications, as uses to avoid.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Use to be avoided: Creating the core content of publications or project applications without thorough factchecking and additional substantive editing. Peer review of publications or project applications by others.

Enseignement

University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance87%

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
AI-proofing betekent dat je een onderwijssituatie creëert waarin studenten geen gebruik kunnen maken van AI, of waarin ze door de mand vallen als ze dat toch doen terwijl het niet is toegestaan.

Affichage localisé only

AI-proofing means creating a teaching situation where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed.

Enseignement

University of Antwerp ECHO teaching guidance says lecturers can balance AI-tool use in open-book exams with deep understanding and fair assessment by designing sufficiently complex questions and clarifying whether and how students may use AI tools.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance86%

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
This can be done by making your exam questions sufficiently complex and specific, and by going over guidelines with the students beforehand, clarifying whether and how they can/may use AI tools in your open-book exam.

Source record

Sources officielles

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance92%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Antwerp AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-antwerp

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert