Policy presence
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain)
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) is listed as QS 2026 rank =191. Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) is listed as QS 2026 rank =191. Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 5 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universite-catholique-de-louvain.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Microsoft Copilot.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Academic integrity
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Approved tools
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Teaching guidance
Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Source Status
UCLouvain maintains a public official AI documents page that centralizes the main institutional documents on use of artificial intelligence at the university.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official_ai_documents_page
Original evidence
Evidence 1Cette page centralise les principaux documents officiels concernant l'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle au sein de l'UCLouvain.
Localized display only
This page centralizes the main official documents concerning the use of artificial intelligence at UCLouvain.
Academic Integrity
UCLouvain's student guidance frames generative AI use in academic work around responsibility, authenticity, and transparency, while telling students to check course-specific rules before using AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: responsibility_authenticity_transparency_course_rules
Original evidence
Evidence 1L’utilisation de l’IA générative dans les travaux universitaires repose sur trois principes généraux : responsabilité, authenticité et transparence.
Localized display only
The guidance says generative AI use in university work rests on responsibility, authenticity, and transparency.
Ai Tool Treatment
UCLouvain's student AI page recommends Piccolo BETA, Wooflash, Microsoft 365 Copilot, and Word Online transcription as available AI-related tools for students and says they respect data protection.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: piccolo_beta_wooflash_copilot_word_online
Original evidence
Evidence 1L'UCLouvain vous recommande trois outils d'IA générative pour vos études : Piccolo BETA (plateforme institutionnelle), Wooflash (révisions interactives) Copilot (Microsoft 365) Word Online (Transcription d'un audio en texte) Tous respectent la protection de vos données.
Localized display only
The student page recommends Piccolo BETA, Wooflash, Copilot, and Word Online transcription and says they respect data protection.
Privacy
UCLouvain describes Piccolo as a free generative-AI interface for staff and students and says it does not train models or monitor conversations based on users' conversations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: piccolo_staff_students_no_training_no_monitoring
Original evidence
Evidence 1L’outil est accessible gratuitement à l’ensemble des membres du personnel de l’UCLouvain ainsi qu’aux étudiant·es. Ce que nous ne faisons pas à l'UCLouvain ... Nous ne faisons pas d'entraînement de modèles sur base de vos conversations. Nous ne réalisons pas de monitoring sur vos conversations.
Localized display only
The Piccolo page says the tool is free for UCLouvain staff and students and that UCLouvain does not train models or monitor conversations based on users' conversations.
Teaching
UCLouvain's 2024 working-group note recommends that teachers be explicit about whether generative AI is allowed or prohibited in learning activities and advises against using AI detectors to determine precisely whether a text was generated by AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: explicit_ai_rules_detection_not_precise
Original evidence
Evidence 1Lorsqu’une activité d’apprentissage est proposée aux étudiant·es, il faut être explicite sur l’utilisation possible de l’IA générative : Sont-ils permis ou interdits ? ... Les détecteurs d'IA ne peuvent dès lors pas être utilisés pour déterminer avec précision ou donner un jugement définitif.
Localized display only
The 2024 working-group note recommends explicit rules on whether generative AI is allowed or prohibited in learning activities and says AI detectors cannot determine precisely or give a definitive judgment.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
5 source attribution
Les documents officiels
uclouvain.be
Lignes directrices pour une utilisation responsable de l'intelligence artificielle générative à destination des étudiants
uclouvain.be
Mes études et l'intelligence artificielle générative
uclouvain.be
Note du Groupe de Travail sur l'Utilisation Responsable de l'IA Générative
oer.uclouvain.be
Piccolo
uclouvain.be
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.