Diepenbeek, Belgium

Hasselt University

Hasselt University has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.

Hasselt University AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Hasselt University has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: Hasselt University is listed as QS 2026 rank =597.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Hasselt University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/hasselt-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage4 reviewedSource languageen, nlPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/hasselt-university.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes Research claims.
  • Named AI services detected in public claims: Gemini.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources5

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score55/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence77%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Exams

Hasselt University has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

Hasselt University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

Hasselt University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

UHasselt's public student AI guidance says students are responsible for submitted work, the work should reflect their own knowledge and skills, and AI use during exams is not allowed unless explicitly permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: student_responsibility_exam_ai_limit

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Bij UHasselt gelden de volgende twee basisrichtlijnen: 1. Verantwoordelijkheid: Je bent volledig verantwoordelijk voor het werk dat je indient. 2. Eigen competenties: Het ingediende werk moet je eigen kennis en vaardigheden weerspiegelen.

Localized display only

UHasselt states two student AI-use principles: responsibility for submitted work and work reflecting the student's own knowledge and skills.

Source Status

UHasselt publishes a public AI@UHasselt hub and a March 2025 general framework for generative AI that focuses on large language models within education, research, service, and internal organization.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: public_ai_framework_available

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Dit beleidskader verduidelijkt de visie van Universiteit Hasselt (UHasselt) op het gebruik van artificiële intelligentie (AI) binnen de universitaire context, met een bijzondere nadruk op generatieve AI (genAI) en large language models (LLM's).

Localized display only

The framework explains UHasselt's view on AI use in the university context, with particular emphasis on generative AI and LLMs.

Privacy

UHasselt's AI-tools page recommends using AI tools critically and says highly sensitive or personal information should not be entered even in paid versions; it recommends Gemini Pro for general AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: ai_tool_safety_and_privacy_caution

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Hoewel je in het overzicht hieronder aanbevelingen van AI-tools vindt, is het belangrijk dat je met deze tools altijd kritisch en doordacht omgaat. In veel gevallen is de betalende licentie veiliger dan de gratis versie, maar ook in de betalende versies is het afgeraden om zeer gevoelige of persoonlijke informatie in te geven.

Localized display only

UHasselt says AI tools should be used critically and thoughtfully, and advises against entering highly sensitive or personal information even in paid versions.

Research

UHasselt's research guidance for generative AI tells researchers to remain responsible, use GenAI transparently, pay attention to IPR and privacy, respect existing regulations, and avoid GenAI for sensitive activities such as peer review.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: research_genai_responsibility_transparency_privacy

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Researchers are ultimately responsible for the integrity generated by the AI tools. They must be literate about using GenAI, thereby being aware of its limitations and biases.

Localized display only

UHasselt's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for integrity when using AI tools and should understand GenAI limitations and biases.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

5 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities