Policy presence
Hasselt University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Diepenbeek, Belgium
Hasselt University
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
No source-backed public claim about coursework AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about coursework, assignments, or syllabus-level AI use.
Exams
Hasselt University has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Hasselt University has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Hasselt University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Hasselt University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
Hasselt University has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
UHasselt's public student AI guidance says students are responsible for submitted work, the work should reflect their own knowledge and skills, and AI use during exams is not allowed unless explicitly permitted.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_responsibility_exam_ai_limit
Original evidence
Evidence 1Bij UHasselt gelden de volgende twee basisrichtlijnen: 1. Verantwoordelijkheid: Je bent volledig verantwoordelijk voor het werk dat je indient. 2. Eigen competenties: Het ingediende werk moet je eigen kennis en vaardigheden weerspiegelen.
Localized display only
UHasselt states two student AI-use principles: responsibility for submitted work and work reflecting the student's own knowledge and skills.
Source Status
UHasselt publishes a public AI@UHasselt hub and a March 2025 general framework for generative AI that focuses on large language models within education, research, service, and internal organization.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: public_ai_framework_available
Original evidence
Evidence 1Dit beleidskader verduidelijkt de visie van Universiteit Hasselt (UHasselt) op het gebruik van artificiële intelligentie (AI) binnen de universitaire context, met een bijzondere nadruk op generatieve AI (genAI) en large language models (LLM's).
Localized display only
The framework explains UHasselt's view on AI use in the university context, with particular emphasis on generative AI and LLMs.
Privacy
UHasselt's AI-tools page recommends using AI tools critically and says highly sensitive or personal information should not be entered even in paid versions; it recommends Gemini Pro for general AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_tool_safety_and_privacy_caution
Original evidence
Evidence 1Hoewel je in het overzicht hieronder aanbevelingen van AI-tools vindt, is het belangrijk dat je met deze tools altijd kritisch en doordacht omgaat. In veel gevallen is de betalende licentie veiliger dan de gratis versie, maar ook in de betalende versies is het afgeraden om zeer gevoelige of persoonlijke informatie in te geven.
Localized display only
UHasselt says AI tools should be used critically and thoughtfully, and advises against entering highly sensitive or personal information even in paid versions.
Research
UHasselt's research guidance for generative AI tells researchers to remain responsible, use GenAI transparently, pay attention to IPR and privacy, respect existing regulations, and avoid GenAI for sensitive activities such as peer review.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_genai_responsibility_transparency_privacy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers are ultimately responsible for the integrity generated by the AI tools. They must be literate about using GenAI, thereby being aware of its limitations and biases.
Localized display only
UHasselt's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for integrity when using AI tools and should understand GenAI limitations and biases.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
5 source attribution
AI-tools
uhasselt.be
AI@UHasselt
uhasselt.be
Algemeen beleidskader UHasselt (Generatieve) Artificiële Intelligentie
uhasselt.be
Effectief en verantwoord gebruik van AI in je studie
uhasselt.be
Generative Artificial Intelligence in Research
uhasselt.be