University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Hasselt University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Claims4Sources5Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Hasselt University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Hasselt University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Hasselt University combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # Hasselt University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UHasselt's public student AI guidance says students are responsible for submitted work, the work should reflect their own knowledge and skills, and AI use during exams is not allowed unless explicitly permitted.
3+Evidence (nl, f10f5b18b6b7): Bij UHasselt gelden de volgende twee basisrichtlijnen: 1. Verantwoordelijkheid: Je bent volledig verantwoordelijk voor het werk dat je indient. 2. Eigen competenties: Het ingediende werk moet je eigen kennis en vaardigheden weerspiegelen.
4+source_status: UHasselt publishes a public AI@UHasselt hub and a March 2025 general framework for generative AI that focuses on large language models within education, research, service, and internal organization.
5+Evidence (nl, 18e01a161c66): Dit beleidskader verduidelijkt de visie van Universiteit Hasselt (UHasselt) op het gebruik van artificiële intelligentie (AI) binnen de universitaire context, met een bijzondere nadruk op generatieve AI (genAI) en large language models (LLM's).
6+privacy: UHasselt's AI-tools page recommends using AI tools critically and says highly sensitive or personal information should not be entered even in paid versions; it recommends Gemini Pro for general AI use.
7+Evidence (nl, 76a1e1558fa4): Hoewel je in het overzicht hieronder aanbevelingen van AI-tools vindt, is het belangrijk dat je met deze tools altijd kritisch en doordacht omgaat. In veel gevallen is de betalende licentie veiliger dan de gratis versie, maar ook in de betalende versies is het afgeraden om zeer gevoelige of persoonlijke informatie in te geven.
8+research: UHasselt's research guidance for generative AI tells researchers to remain responsible, use GenAI transparently, pay attention to IPR and privacy, respect existing regulations, and avoid GenAI for sensitive activities such as peer review.
9+Evidence (en, 09a4b88be630): Researchers are ultimately responsible for the integrity generated by the AI tools. They must be literate about using GenAI, thereby being aware of its limitations and biases.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

4 claim records

research

UHasselt's research guidance for generative AI tells researchers to remain responsible, use GenAI transparently, pay attention to IPR and privacy, respect existing regulations, and avoid GenAI for sensitive activities such as peer review.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UHasselt's AI-tools page recommends using AI tools critically and says highly sensitive or personal information should not be entered even in paid versions; it recommends Gemini Pro for general AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesnl

academic_integrity

UHasselt's public student AI guidance says students are responsible for submitted work, the work should reflect their own knowledge and skills, and AI use during exams is not allowed unless explicitly permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesnl

source_status

UHasselt publishes a public AI@UHasselt hub and a March 2025 general framework for generative AI that focuses on large language models within education, research, service, and internal organization.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesnl

Source snapshots

5 source attributions