Dublin, Ireland

Technological University Dublin

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technological University Dublin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%

Genormaliseerde waarde: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"Technological University Dublin provides or institutionally supports Microsoft Copilot.","howToObtain":"Sign in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Users who are signed in with a TU Dublin Office 365 account can access Microsoft Copilot

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 2
Microsoft Copilot is the only AI assistant supported for use at TU Dublin.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Microsoft Copilot is the only AI assistant supported for use at TU Dublin.

Onderzoek

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says artificial intelligence systems and generative models cannot be included as co-authors on research, innovation, or scholarly outputs.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%

Genormaliseerde waarde: AI systems and generative models cannot be co-authors

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
In line with the University’s Authorship and Publication policy, artificial intelligence systems and/or generative models cannot be included as co-authors on any research, innovation or scholarly output.

Ai Tool Treatment

For student assessment, TU Dublin guidance says generative AI can only be used in ways approved in advance by the lecturer, and that failure to follow the guidelines or inappropriate AI use may result in disciplinary action as a breach of academic integrity.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%

Genormaliseerde waarde: Student GenAI use requires advance lecturer approval for assessments

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
To support academic integrity, GenAI can only be used by students in ways that are approved in advance by their lecturer. Failure to adhere to these guidelines or the inappropriate use of AI, as determined by the relevant Faculty, may result in disciplinary action as it is a breach of academic integrity.

Onderwijs

TU Dublin recommends using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale when designing assessments and communicating with students about how generative AI may be used in a specific assessment.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: AIAS recommended for assessment design and student communication

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
TU Dublin recommends the use of the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale in the design of assessments and for communication with students about assessments.

Onderzoek

TU Dublin's research GenAI guidance says use of generative AI tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations, and data protection standards, and that users are wholly responsible for checking the veracity, accuracy, creative merit, falsification, fabrication, and plagiarism risks of model output.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: Research GenAI use must meet law/data protection obligations and user responsibility

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Use of generative AI systems/tools must follow applicable institutional, national, EU and international laws, regulations and data protection standards. The user of generative AI systems/tools is wholly responsible for ensuring the veracity, accuracy and/or creative merit of the output generated by the model, and for assessing the potential for falsification, fabrication and plagiarism due to the use of the system.

Privacy

TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%

Genormaliseerde waarde: Personal data restricted in unsupported or unapproved GenAI systems

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported/approved by the University. No personal data should be collected, stored or uploaded to a GenAI system, without permission/consent, including images or photographs.

Academic Integrity

TU Dublin's academic integrity page lists submitting work created artificially, including by machine or artificial intelligence, as a form of academic misconduct when submitted as the student's own assessment work.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen92%

Genormaliseerde waarde: AI-created work submitted as own work can be academic misconduct

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Submitting work as your own for assessment, which has, in fact, been done in whole or in part by someone else or submitting work which has been created artificially, e.g., by a machine or through artificial intelligence.

Security Review

For sensitive, confidential, intellectual-property, or peer-review research contexts, TU Dublin guidance says only GenAI systems that do not retain data by default or allow retention to be disabled, or systems on closed or bespoke University hardware platforms, should be used.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%

Genormaliseerde waarde: Sensitive research contexts limited to non-retaining or University-controlled GenAI systems

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
While a broad range of systems and tools are available, only the following should be used in the context of research activities where the information is sensitive, confidential or where there are/may be intellectual property issues, including during peer review practices: Systems which by default do not retain data or which permit user to disable data retention. Systems where the data is created and saved on closed/bespoke University hardware platforms.

Source record

Officiële bronnen

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen97%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Technological University Dublin AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/technological-university-dublin

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen