CDU's AI Design Assistant is controlled by the lecturer and prioritizes lawful, ethical, and responsible use.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-07-19Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-07-19
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
AI Design Assistant is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
CDU students have free access to Microsoft Copilot Web through the university's AI resources.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-07-19Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-07-19
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
Microsoft Copilot Web is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
This policy sets out principles for the use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) at the University. This policy applies to all employees and students of the University.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
Charles Darwin University's formal Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy sets principles for GenAI use and applies to all CDU employees and students.
Students and employees must be transparent about and disclose gen AI use and should refer to the Academic Integrity Policy for more guidance on academic integrity.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.
Types of Academic Misconduct include Generative artificial intelligence: Inappropriate or unsanctioned use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools. CDU staff and students will not tolerate: Misrepresenting AI generated content as your own; Failure to disclose use of AI.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.
claim-cdu-academic-misconduct-genai
Types of Academic Misconduct; Academic Integrity in the Context of Artificial Intelligence
CDU's AI Design Assistant is controlled by the lecturer and prioritizes lawful, ethical, and responsible use.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-07-19Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-07-19
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
AI Design Assistant is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
CDU students have free access to Microsoft Copilot Web through the university's AI resources.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-07-19Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-07-19
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
Microsoft Copilot Web is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
This policy sets out principles for the use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) at the University. This policy applies to all employees and students of the University.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
Charles Darwin University's formal Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy sets principles for GenAI use and applies to all CDU employees and students.
Students and employees must be transparent about and disclose gen AI use and should refer to the Academic Integrity Policy for more guidance on academic integrity.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.
Types of Academic Misconduct include Generative artificial intelligence: Inappropriate or unsanctioned use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools. CDU staff and students will not tolerate: Misrepresenting AI generated content as your own; Failure to disclose use of AI.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.
claim-cdu-academic-misconduct-genai
Types of Academic Misconduct; Academic Integrity in the Context of Artificial Intelligence
Students and employees must be transparent about and disclose gen AI use and should refer to the Academic Integrity Policy for more guidance on academic integrity.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.
Types of Academic Misconduct include Generative artificial intelligence: Inappropriate or unsanctioned use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools. CDU staff and students will not tolerate: Misrepresenting AI generated content as your own; Failure to disclose use of AI.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.
claim-cdu-academic-misconduct-genai
Types of Academic Misconduct; Academic Integrity in the Context of Artificial Intelligence
GenAI tools may assist but should not replace the candidate's original intellectual contribution. Do I need to acknowledge GenAI use? Yes--clearly. Can I use GenAI to read, critique, or offer feedback on student work? No. Can I use GenAI to assess or critique candidate work? No.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.
claim-cdu-hdr-genai-limits
HDR studies FAQ for students, supervisors, and external examiners
Staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes; however, University information that is confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable must not be entered into such tools unless it has been appropriately de-identified or redacted. Where the hosting location, ownership, or data-handling practices of a generative AI tool are unknown or unclear, the tool must not be used with University information.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.
CDU's AI Design Assistant is controlled by the lecturer and prioritizes lawful, ethical, and responsible use.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-07-19Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-07-19
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
AI Design Assistant is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
CDU students have free access to Microsoft Copilot Web through the university's AI resources.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-07-19Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-07-19
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
Microsoft Copilot Web is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
This policy sets out principles for the use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) at the University. This policy applies to all employees and students of the University.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
Charles Darwin University's formal Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy sets principles for GenAI use and applies to all CDU employees and students.
The University does not generally maintain a static list of "approved", "preferred", or "endorsed" gen AI platforms. Approval by the Design Authority is required prior to the adoption of new gen AI platforms where they are to be institutionally implemented, integrated with University systems, or used to process University data.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU says it does not generally maintain a static approved, preferred, or endorsed GenAI platform list, and Design Authority approval is required before institutionally adopting new GenAI platforms that are implemented, integrated, or used to process University data.
Staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes; however, University information that is confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable must not be entered into such tools unless it has been appropriately de-identified or redacted. Where the hosting location, ownership, or data-handling practices of a generative AI tool are unknown or unclear, the tool must not be used with University information.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.
There are circumstances when the use of gen AI is never acceptable. This includes in the conduct of peer review, the generation of substantive content of research outputs, including HDR theses, and in the writing of the critical components of ethics applications.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU's GenAI policy says GenAI use is never acceptable in peer review, in generating substantive content of research outputs including HDR theses, or in writing critical components of ethics applications.
GenAI tools may assist but should not replace the candidate's original intellectual contribution. Do I need to acknowledge GenAI use? Yes--clearly. Can I use GenAI to read, critique, or offer feedback on student work? No. Can I use GenAI to assess or critique candidate work? No.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.
claim-cdu-hdr-genai-limits
HDR studies FAQ for students, supervisors, and external examiners
Students and employees must be transparent about and disclose gen AI use and should refer to the Academic Integrity Policy for more guidance on academic integrity.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.
Types of Academic Misconduct include Generative artificial intelligence: Inappropriate or unsanctioned use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools. CDU staff and students will not tolerate: Misrepresenting AI generated content as your own; Failure to disclose use of AI.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.
claim-cdu-academic-misconduct-genai
Types of Academic Misconduct; Academic Integrity in the Context of Artificial Intelligence
Staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes; however, University information that is confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable must not be entered into such tools unless it has been appropriately de-identified or redacted. Where the hosting location, ownership, or data-handling practices of a generative AI tool are unknown or unclear, the tool must not be used with University information.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.
The University does not generally maintain a static list of "approved", "preferred", or "endorsed" gen AI platforms. Approval by the Design Authority is required prior to the adoption of new gen AI platforms where they are to be institutionally implemented, integrated with University systems, or used to process University data.
Bron opgehaald: 2026-05-16Claim gecontroleerd: 2026-05-16
Details van uitspraak en vindplaats
CDU says it does not generally maintain a static approved, preferred, or endorsed GenAI platform list, and Design Authority approval is required before institutionally adopting new GenAI platforms that are implemented, integrated, or used to process University data.
Students and employees must be transparent about and disclose gen AI use and should refer to the Academic Integrity Policy for more guidance on academic integrity.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
80db2f71…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Integrity, paragraph 18
Academische integriteit
CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.
Types of Academic Misconduct include Generative artificial intelligence: Inappropriate or unsanctioned use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools. CDU staff and students will not tolerate: Misrepresenting AI generated content as your own; Failure to disclose use of AI.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
d7737b90…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Types of Academic Misconduct; Academic Integrity in the Context of Artificial Intelligence
Privacybescherming Beoordeelde uitspraken: 1
Privacybescherming
CDU prohibits employees and students from putting confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into GenAI platforms.
Employees and students must ensure they do not put confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into gen AI platforms.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
80db2f71…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Data, privacy, and security, paragraph 21
Beveiligingsbeoordeling Beoordeelde uitspraken: 1
Beveiligingsbeoordeling
CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.
Staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes; however, University information that is confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable must not be entered into such tools unless it has been appropriately de-identified or redacted. Where the hosting location, ownership, or data-handling practices of a generative AI tool are unknown or unclear, the tool must not be used with University information.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
87b58795…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Use of generative AI tools, paragraph 49
Onderzoek Beoordeelde uitspraken: 2
Onderzoek
CDU's GenAI policy says GenAI use is never acceptable in peer review, in generating substantive content of research outputs including HDR theses, or in writing critical components of ethics applications.
There are circumstances when the use of gen AI is never acceptable. This includes in the conduct of peer review, the generation of substantive content of research outputs, including HDR theses, and in the writing of the critical components of ethics applications.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
80db2f71…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Research, paragraph 33
Onderzoek
For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.
GenAI tools may assist but should not replace the candidate's original intellectual contribution. Do I need to acknowledge GenAI use? Yes--clearly. Can I use GenAI to read, critique, or offer feedback on student work? No. Can I use GenAI to assess or critique candidate work? No.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
b47798a2…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
HDR studies FAQ for students, supervisors, and external examiners
Regels voor AI-tools Beoordeelde uitspraken: 3
Regels voor AI-tools
AI Design Assistant is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%
Genormaliseerde waarde: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"AI Design Assistant","description":"Lecturer-controlled AI design assistant presented in CDU's staff AI resources.","howToObtain":"Access through CDU's staff AI resources when enabled by the lecturer.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
Laatst gecontroleerd
19 jul 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
19 jul 2026
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1
CDU's AI Design Assistant is controlled by the lecturer and prioritizes lawful, ethical, and responsible use.
Gelokaliseerde weergave only
CDU's AI Design Assistant is controlled by the lecturer and prioritizes lawful, ethical, and responsible use.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
c7c98742…
Opgehaald
19 jul 2026
Regels voor AI-tools
Microsoft Copilot Web is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%
Genormaliseerde waarde: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Web","description":"Free Microsoft Copilot web access for CDU students.","howToObtain":"Use the Copilot link from CDU's AI resources and authenticate as directed.","costToUser":"Free.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
Laatst gecontroleerd
19 jul 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
19 jul 2026
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Bewijs 1
CDU students have free access to Microsoft Copilot Web through the university's AI resources.
Gelokaliseerde weergave only
CDU students have free access to Microsoft Copilot Web through the university's AI resources.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
a9a3684b…
Opgehaald
19 jul 2026
Regels voor AI-tools
Charles Darwin University's formal Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy sets principles for GenAI use and applies to all CDU employees and students.
This policy sets out principles for the use of generative artificial intelligence (gen AI) at the University. This policy applies to all employees and students of the University.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
80db2f71…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Sections 2-3, paragraphs 2-3
Inkoop Beoordeelde uitspraken: 1
Inkoop
CDU says it does not generally maintain a static approved, preferred, or endorsed GenAI platform list, and Design Authority approval is required before institutionally adopting new GenAI platforms that are implemented, integrated, or used to process University data.
The University does not generally maintain a static list of "approved", "preferred", or "endorsed" gen AI platforms. Approval by the Design Authority is required prior to the adoption of new gen AI platforms where they are to be institutionally implemented, integrated with University systems, or used to process University data.
Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
80db2f71…
Opgehaald
16 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Platforms and usage, paragraphs 10-11
Bronrecord
Officiële bronnen
Bronnen: 6
6 official URLs; 6 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
Academic Integrity
www.cdu.edu.au
Officiële universiteitsbron
cdu.edu.au
Hash and captured version
Academic Integrity · 2026-05-16T21:28:00.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citaat: University AI Policy Tracker. "Charles Darwin University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/charles-darwin-university
De oorspronkelijke taal van de universiteitsbron blijft leidend. Deze tracker is geen officiële verklaring van de universiteit.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Veelgestelde vragen
Veelgestelde vragen
Mag ik AI gebruiken voor opdrachten?
Charles Darwin University has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
