public-release-20260718-008
Compared with public-release-20260717-001.
Charles Darwin University public-release-20260718-008 diff
Comparing public-release-20260717-001 to public-release-20260718-008.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Charles Darwin University currently has 10 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 19, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 2 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
This page combines all public release diffs for Charles Darwin University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Comparing public-release-20260717-001 to public-release-20260718-008.
1 public release diff
Compared with public-release-20260717-001.
Comparing public-release-20260717-001 to public-release-20260718-008.
10 claim records
Microsoft Copilot Web is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
AI Design Assistant is listed for Charles Darwin University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
CDU's GenAI policy says GenAI use is never acceptable in peer review, in generating substantive content of research outputs including HDR theses, or in writing critical components of ethics applications.
For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.
CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.
CDU staff may use generative AI tools for legitimate work purposes, but must not enter confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable University information unless it is appropriately de-identified or redacted; tools with unclear hosting, ownership, or data handling must not be used with University information.
CDU prohibits employees and students from putting confidential or sensitive information or intellectual property into GenAI platforms.
CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.
CDU says it does not generally maintain a static approved, preferred, or endorsed GenAI platform list, and Design Authority approval is required before institutionally adopting new GenAI platforms that are implemented, integrated, or used to process University data.
Charles Darwin University's formal Generative Artificial Intelligence Policy sets principles for GenAI use and applies to all CDU employees and students.
6 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 9:28 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at Jul 19, 2026, 3:15 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at Jul 19, 2026, 3:14 AM
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 9:22 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 9:25 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 9:31 PM