academic_integrity
UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
Wijzigingslogboek
University of Johannesburg
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Samenvatting wijzigingen
Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.
University of Johannesburg currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor University of Johannesburg. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.
Er zijn nog geen beleidverschillen tussen releases geregistreerd voor deze universiteit. De pagina houdt nog steeds bij welke bronnen onderbouwing bieden, officiële bronaanwijzingen, de beoordelingsstatus, de actualiteit van bronnen en openbare JSON voor ontdekking en citatie.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.
Diff-categorieën
Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.
Gecombineerd releasediff
Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.
Universiteit of Johannesburg combined release verschil
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+6-0
11 # University of Johannesburg AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
3+Evidence (en, 7b2880ce8629): To present the work of someone else or of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one’s own, is academic dishonesty. To mitigate the risks of academic misconduct, in the context of generative AI, it is recommended that: students and researchers be transparent and sign a declaration that the work is their own.
4+academic_integrity: UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
5+Evidence (en, 3bb6efba73e2): How you use generative AI depends on your course, department, or faculty rules, as well as UJ policy. Familiarise yourself with the rules and requirements before you produce assignments and assessments.
6+teaching: UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
7+Evidence (en, 71a0a789d9a8): Appropriate use of generative AI should apply the following parameters: Clear communication of the institutional/ departmental/ course regulations on the use of generative AI, including referencing generated content, developing proficiency in prompt generation, and harnessing the benefits of generative AI.
Geschiedenis releases
0 public release diffs
Aanpassingen claimen
3 Claimen registers
teaching
UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
academic_integrity
UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
Bronsnapshots
3 source attributions
Staff Guide: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 mei 2026, 05:23
UJ Practice Note: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 mei 2026, 05:23
UJ Quick Guide for Students: Using Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Learning Tool
official_pdf Tracker checked at 16 mei 2026, 05:19