University AI Policy Tracker

Open, op bewijs gebaseerde AI-beleidsrecords van universiteiten voor publiek hergebruik.

APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Claims5Sources4Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz AI policy record
2+teaching: The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.
3+Evidence (en, 29d91b710c95): The decision as to which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form is the responsibility of the teacher. The scope and form of use must be explicitly stated in the course description and made known to the students before the start of the course.
4+academic_integrity: For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.
5+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): It is crucial to consider the following points when using AI in your writing: Use AI only according to the AI guidelines of the respective course; Label and document AI use; Check the content of all AI-generated information.
6+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.
7+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): The University of Graz has decided not to prohibit the use of AI technologies. However, the University's orientation guidelines stipulate that lecturers can determine "which text-generating AI systems may be used and in what way".
8+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.
9+Evidence (en, 68bec1ce8bb9): uniGPT is the AI-supported chatbot for employees of the University of Graz and has been available since May 2024. In May 2025, studiGPT was introduced as a further variant especially for students of the university. Log in with your personal Uni Graz account.
10+teaching: University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.
11+Evidence (de-AT, a15d5c03822d): Ist die Verwendung von generativer Künstlicher Intelligenz erwünscht oder gar nötig, um die Lernergebnisse zu erreichen, sind die gelisteten Prüfungsformate möglich. Nutzungsform und -ausmaß von generativer künstlicher Intelligenz sowie die Dokumentationsform müssen aber natürlich im Vorhinein definiert und kommuniziert werden.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

teaching

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde-AT

Source snapshots

4 source attributions