University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPLNL

Wijzigingslogboek

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldLaatst gecontroleerd18 mei 2026Laatst gewijzigd18 mei 2026Claims5Bronnen4Releaseregistraties0
UniversiteitspaginaOpenbaar JSONMaandrapportUniversiteitsindex

Samenvatting wijzigingen

Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 18 mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

Er zijn nog geen beleidverschillen tussen releases geregistreerd voor deze universiteit. De pagina houdt nog steeds bij welke bronnen onderbouwing bieden, officiële bronaanwijzingen, de beoordelingsstatus, de actualiteit van bronnen en openbare JSON voor ontdekking en citatie.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Diff-categorieën

Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd0Bewijs0Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd0Bron verwijderd0

Gecombineerd releasediff

Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz combined release verschil

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz AI policy record
2+teaching: The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.
3+Evidence (en, 29d91b710c95): The decision as to which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form is the responsibility of the teacher. The scope and form of use must be explicitly stated in the course description and made known to the students before the start of the course.
4+academic_integrity: For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.
5+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): It is crucial to consider the following points when using AI in your writing: Use AI only according to the AI guidelines of the respective course; Label and document AI use; Check the content of all AI-generated information.
6+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.
7+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): The University of Graz has decided not to prohibit the use of AI technologies. However, the University's orientation guidelines stipulate that lecturers can determine "which text-generating AI systems may be used and in what way".
8+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.
9+Evidence (en, 68bec1ce8bb9): uniGPT is the AI-supported chatbot for employees of the University of Graz and has been available since May 2024. In May 2025, studiGPT was introduced as a further variant especially for students of the university. Log in with your personal Uni Graz account.
10+teaching: University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.
11+Evidence (de-AT, a15d5c03822d): Ist die Verwendung von generativer Künstlicher Intelligenz erwünscht oder gar nötig, um die Lernergebnisse zu erreichen, sind die gelisteten Prüfungsformate möglich. Nutzungsform und -ausmaß von generativer künstlicher Intelligenz sowie die Dokumentationsform müssen aber natürlich im Vorhinein definiert und kommuniziert werden.

Geschiedenis releases

0 public release diffs

Aanpassingen claimen

5 Claimen registers

teaching

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%Bewijs1Talenen

academic_integrity

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%Bewijs1Talenen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen92%Bewijs1Talenen

teaching

University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%Bewijs1Talende-AT

Bronsnapshots

4 source attributions