变更日志

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月18日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz AI policy record
2+teaching: The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.
3+Evidence (en, 29d91b710c95): The decision as to which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form is the responsibility of the teacher. The scope and form of use must be explicitly stated in the course description and made known to the students before the start of the course.
4+academic_integrity: For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.
5+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): It is crucial to consider the following points when using AI in your writing: Use AI only according to the AI guidelines of the respective course; Label and document AI use; Check the content of all AI-generated information.
6+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.
7+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): The University of Graz has decided not to prohibit the use of AI technologies. However, the University's orientation guidelines stipulate that lecturers can determine "which text-generating AI systems may be used and in what way".
8+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.
9+Evidence (en, 68bec1ce8bb9): uniGPT is the AI-supported chatbot for employees of the University of Graz and has been available since May 2024. In May 2025, studiGPT was introduced as a further variant especially for students of the university. Log in with your personal Uni Graz account.
10+teaching: University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.
11+Evidence (de-AT, a15d5c03822d): Ist die Verwendung von generativer Künstlicher Intelligenz erwünscht oder gar nötig, um die Lernergebnisse zu erreichen, sind die gelisteten Prüfungsformate möglich. Nutzungsform und -ausmaß von generativer künstlicher Intelligenz sowie die Dokumentationsform müssen aber natürlich im Vorhinein definiert und kommuniziert werden.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

5 声明 条记录

teaching

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言en

teaching

University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言de-AT

源快照

4 source attributions