University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

APIGitHub

Change log

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Claims5Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz AI policy record
2+teaching: The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.
3+Evidence (en, 29d91b710c95): The decision as to which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form is the responsibility of the teacher. The scope and form of use must be explicitly stated in the course description and made known to the students before the start of the course.
4+academic_integrity: For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.
5+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): It is crucial to consider the following points when using AI in your writing: Use AI only according to the AI guidelines of the respective course; Label and document AI use; Check the content of all AI-generated information.
6+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.
7+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): The University of Graz has decided not to prohibit the use of AI technologies. However, the University's orientation guidelines stipulate that lecturers can determine "which text-generating AI systems may be used and in what way".
8+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.
9+Evidence (en, 68bec1ce8bb9): uniGPT is the AI-supported chatbot for employees of the University of Graz and has been available since May 2024. In May 2025, studiGPT was introduced as a further variant especially for students of the university. Log in with your personal Uni Graz account.
10+teaching: University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.
11+Evidence (de-AT, a15d5c03822d): Ist die Verwendung von generativer Künstlicher Intelligenz erwünscht oder gar nötig, um die Lernergebnisse zu erreichen, sind die gelisteten Prüfungsformate möglich. Nutzungsform und -ausmaß von generativer künstlicher Intelligenz sowie die Dokumentationsform müssen aber natürlich im Vorhinein definiert und kommuniziert werden.

Claim changes

5 claim records

teaching

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde-AT

Source snapshots

4 source attributions