Graz, Austria

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources4Source languagede-AT, enPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/karl-franzens-universitaet-graz.json

Policy profile

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Teaching

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: teacher_responsibility_course_description

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The decision as to which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form is the responsibility of the teacher. The scope and form of use must be explicitly stated in the course description and made known to the students before the start of the course.

Academic Integrity

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: document_and_label_ai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
It is crucial to consider the following points when using AI in your writing: Use AI only according to the AI guidelines of the respective course; Label and document AI use; Check the content of all AI-generated information.

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: lecturer_determined_ai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The University of Graz has decided not to prohibit the use of AI technologies. However, the University's orientation guidelines stipulate that lecturers can determine "which text-generating AI systems may be used and in what way".

Ai Tool Treatment

The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: unigpt_staff_studigpt_students

Original evidence

Evidence 1
uniGPT is the AI-supported chatbot for employees of the University of Graz and has been available since May 2024. In May 2025, studiGPT was introduced as a further variant especially for students of the university. Log in with your personal Uni Graz account.

Teaching

University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: assessment_ai_transparency

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Ist die Verwendung von generativer Künstlicher Intelligenz erwünscht oder gar nötig, um die Lernergebnisse zu erreichen, sind die gelisteten Prüfungsformate möglich. Nutzungsform und -ausmaß von generativer künstlicher Intelligenz sowie die Dokumentationsform müssen aber natürlich im Vorhinein definiert und kommuniziert werden.

Localized display only

If the use of generative AI is desired or necessary for learning outcomes, the form and extent of use and the documentation form should be defined and communicated in advance.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities