University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Bahasa
ENZHFRPLMS

Log perubahan

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenTerakhir diperiksa18 Mei 2026Terkini diubah18 Mei 2026Tuntutan5Sumber4Rekod keluaran0
Halaman universitiJSON awamLaporan bulananIndeks universiti

Ringkasan perubahan

Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 18 Mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz. Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.

Belum ada baris perbezaan dasar antara pelepasan yang direkodkan untuk universiti ini. Halaman masih menjejak tuntutan disokong sumber semasa, atribusi rasmi sumber, keadaan semakan, kesegaran sumber, dan JSON awam untuk penemuan dan petikan.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.

Kategori perbezaan

Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu0Bukti0Snapshot sumber0Teks sumber0Sumber ditambah0Sumber dialih keluar0

Perbezaan pelepasan gabungan

Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz combined release perbezaan

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz AI policy record
2+teaching: The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.
3+Evidence (en, 29d91b710c95): The decision as to which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form is the responsibility of the teacher. The scope and form of use must be explicitly stated in the course description and made known to the students before the start of the course.
4+academic_integrity: For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.
5+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): It is crucial to consider the following points when using AI in your writing: Use AI only according to the AI guidelines of the respective course; Label and document AI use; Check the content of all AI-generated information.
6+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.
7+Evidence (en, b3c3158fb71b): The University of Graz has decided not to prohibit the use of AI technologies. However, the University's orientation guidelines stipulate that lecturers can determine "which text-generating AI systems may be used and in what way".
8+ai_tool_treatment: The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.
9+Evidence (en, 68bec1ce8bb9): uniGPT is the AI-supported chatbot for employees of the University of Graz and has been available since May 2024. In May 2025, studiGPT was introduced as a further variant especially for students of the university. Log in with your personal Uni Graz account.
10+teaching: University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.
11+Evidence (de-AT, a15d5c03822d): Ist die Verwendung von generativer Künstlicher Intelligenz erwünscht oder gar nötig, um die Lernergebnisse zu erreichen, sind die gelisteten Prüfungsformate möglich. Nutzungsform und -ausmaß von generativer künstlicher Intelligenz sowie die Dokumentationsform müssen aber natürlich im Vorhinein definiert und kommuniziert werden.

Sejarah keluaran

0 public release diffs

Perubahan tuntutan

5 rekod Tuntut

teaching

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti1Bahasaen

academic_integrity

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%Bukti1Bahasaen

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Graz identifies uniGPT for employees and studiGPT for students as data-protection-friendly university chatbots accessed with a personal Uni Graz account.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan92%Bukti1Bahasaen

teaching

University of Graz teacher guidance says that when generative AI is used in assessments, teachers should make the permitted form and extent of use and the documentation form transparent in advance.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan90%Bukti1Bahasade-AT

Snapshot sumber

4 source attributions