Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Odense, Denmark
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 16, 2026.
v1 public contract
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 16, 2026. Discovery context: University of Southern Denmark (SDU) is listed as QS 2026 rank =303.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Southern Denmark (SDU) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-southern-denmark-sdu.json. The entity-level confidence is 92%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Southern Denmark (SDU) has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: generative_ai_material_must_be_disclosed_or_marked_missing_disclosure_treated_as_plagiarism
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Du skal oplyse om, eller markere det tydeligt, hvis du inkluderer materiale fra generativ AI direkte eller i redigeret form i din opgave. Manglende oplysning eller markering vil blive behandlet som plagiat.
Affichage localise only
Students must disclose or clearly mark direct or edited material from generative AI in an assignment; missing disclosure or marking will be treated as plagiarism.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: generative_ai_allowed_with_disclosure_for_written_home_assignments
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Du må anvende generativ AI, når du udfærdiger skriftlige hjemmeopgaver, herunder skriftlige hjemmeopgaver med mundtligt forsvar, bachelorprojekt, afgangsprojekt og speciale, dog skal du angive det tydeligt
Affichage localise only
Students may use generative AI when preparing written home assignments, including written home assignments with oral defence, bachelor's projects, final projects and theses, but must state this clearly.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: generative_ai_not_allowed_for_supervised_or_oral_exams_unless_course_exception
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Du må ikke anvende generativ AI i forbindelse med skriftlige stedprøver, andre prøver under opsyn eller i forbindelse med mundtlige prøver. Eventuelle undtagelser fra de ovenstående generelle regler vil fremgå af fagbeskrivelsen.
Affichage localise only
Students may not use generative AI for written in-person exams, other supervised exams or oral exams; any exceptions will appear in the course description.
Privacy
Normalized value: generative_ai_prompts_must_not_contain_sensitive_or_confidential_information
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Generativ AI-værktøjer er ikke nødvendigvis GPDR kompatible. Derfor må prompts aldrig indeholde personfølsomme eller fortrolige oplysninger, herunder forsknings-/forretningshemmeligheder.
Affichage localise only
Generative AI tools are not necessarily GDPR compliant; prompts must never contain sensitive personal or confidential information, including research or business secrets.
Teaching
Normalized value: copilot_chat_available_but_not_required_to_pass_subject
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Copilot Chat is made available to all students and all employees at SDU via the Microsoft licenses. SDU Digital describes Copilot Chat as the counterpart to ChatGPT. Please be note that the use of Copilot Chat for the students must not be a prerequisite for them to be able to pass a subject.
Affichage localise only
Copilot Chat is available to students and employees via Microsoft licenses, but student use of Copilot Chat must not be a prerequisite for passing a subject.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
2 source attribution
mitsdu.dk
sdu.dk
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.