Regina, Canada

University of Regina

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

8 reviewed claims

Confidentialité

University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%

Valeur normalisée: GenAI project and system data is institutional data governed by privacy and data handling rules.

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Data used to develop algorithms or GenAI systems, and any data generated, shared, managed and/or recorded as part of an GenAI system's operation or algorithm, will be considered institutional data and must be managed in alignment with GOV-060-005 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and the University's data handling standards.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%

Valeur normalisée: Formal GenAI operations policy for employee governance and operations use.

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.

Security Review

For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%

Valeur normalisée: GenAI projects require risk assessment, and university-wide or enterprise-data GenAI uses require IT project approval.

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%

Valeur normalisée: Turnitin is the institutionally adopted AI-detection tool; non-approved AI-detection tools are not permitted.

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.

Academic Integrity

The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%

Valeur normalisée: Student AI use is course/instructor-specific, and unauthorized use can be academic misconduct.

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.

Enseignement

University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance89%

Valeur normalisée: Faculty/instructor guidance recommends clear rules, disclosure, and privacy/IP protection for GenAI in coursework.

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.

Academic Integrity

Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance86%

Valeur normalisée: Library guidance frames acceptable GenAI use around permission, assignment instructions, accuracy checks, and citation.

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?

Academic Integrity

Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance84%

Valeur normalisée: Library citation guidance advises instructor confirmation and style-specific treatment for AI-generated materials.

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.

Source record

Sources officielles

5 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance95%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Regina AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 25, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-regina

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert