University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Journal des modifications

University of Regina

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Révision: Révisé par un agentVérifié pour la dernière fois25 mai 2026Dernière modification25 mai 2026Affirmations8Sources5Dernière versionpublic-release-20260526-003Enregistrements de version1
Page universitaireJSON publicRapport mensuelIndex des universités

Résumé des modifications

Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.

University of Regina currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 25 mai 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 8 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour University of Regina. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.

Catégories de différences

Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits8Preuve0Instantanés source0Texte source0Source ajoutée5Source supprimée0

Différentiel de version combinée

Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.

différentiel Université of Regina combined release

Comparaison de public-release-20260526-001 avec public-release-20260526-003.

+34-0
11 # University of Regina AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
5+Evidence (en, 165d1213815a): Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.
10+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): Data used to develop algorithms or GenAI systems, and any data generated, shared, managed and/or recorded as part of an GenAI system's operation or algorithm, will be considered institutional data and must be managed in alignment with GOV-060-005 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and the University's data handling standards.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+ai_tool_treatment: University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.
15+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+security_review: For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.
20+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
25+Evidence (en, 165d1213815a): It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.
30+Evidence (en, b1121fb5f16d): These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:20.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+academic_integrity: Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.
35+Evidence (en, 2cd38ba0cea8): In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:21.000Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+academic_integrity: The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.
40+Evidence (en, 5668f134e50a): Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:18.000Z
1842 ## Source attribution added
1943 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
44+Source https://ctl.uregina.ca/generative-ai-at-the-university-of-regina snapshot 165d1213815a7524b0561aca56313418d2c6d09eaf8986654cc21f5da6bc5c73
45+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
2046 ## Source attribution added
2147 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
48+Source https://library.uregina.ca/ai/cite snapshot 2cd38ba0cea8af0951c471e8832911c462d4a3a9363a7a5cab2cee0c8452f767
49+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:21.000Z
2250 ## Source attribution added
2351 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
52+Source https://library.uregina.ca/ai/use snapshot b1121fb5f16de36348403db0263b0b05845a1b6d21c3efa341bf287d0a86a275
53+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:20.000Z
2454 ## Source attribution added
2555 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
56+Source https://www.uregina.ca/policy/browse-policy/policy-ops-080-050.html snapshot 0bc7c384798934b20ad30a5b1954882ae77fb5a8e43aee814f4397e5a5641849
57+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
2658 ## Source attribution added
2759 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
60+Source https://www.uregina.ca/stories/2024/02/academic-integrity-and-artificial-intelligence.html snapshot 5668f134e50a7c202b2cd0acbe9d3f1e12a6e35c4843b54a0892c735d4a74a65
61+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:18.000Z

Historique des versions

1 diff de publication publique

public-release-20260526-003

Comparé à public-release-20260526-001.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits8Instantanés source0Texte source0
Diff de versionDifférences JSON

différentiel Université of Regina public-release-20260526-003

Comparaison de public-release-20260526-001 avec public-release-20260526-003.

+34-0
11 # University of Regina AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.
5+Evidence (en, 165d1213815a): Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.
10+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): Data used to develop algorithms or GenAI systems, and any data generated, shared, managed and/or recorded as part of an GenAI system's operation or algorithm, will be considered institutional data and must be managed in alignment with GOV-060-005 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and the University's data handling standards.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+ai_tool_treatment: University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.
15+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+security_review: For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.
20+Evidence (en, 0bc7c3847989): Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+teaching: University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.
25+Evidence (en, 165d1213815a): It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
1227 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1328 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
29+academic_integrity: Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.
30+Evidence (en, b1121fb5f16d): These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?
31+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:20.000Z
1432 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1533 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
34+academic_integrity: Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.
35+Evidence (en, 2cd38ba0cea8): In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.
36+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:21.000Z
1637 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1738 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
39+academic_integrity: The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.
40+Evidence (en, 5668f134e50a): Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.
41+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:18.000Z
1842 ## Source attribution added
1943 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
44+Source https://ctl.uregina.ca/generative-ai-at-the-university-of-regina snapshot 165d1213815a7524b0561aca56313418d2c6d09eaf8986654cc21f5da6bc5c73
45+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:19.000Z
2046 ## Source attribution added
2147 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
48+Source https://library.uregina.ca/ai/cite snapshot 2cd38ba0cea8af0951c471e8832911c462d4a3a9363a7a5cab2cee0c8452f767
49+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:21.000Z
2250 ## Source attribution added
2351 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
52+Source https://library.uregina.ca/ai/use snapshot b1121fb5f16de36348403db0263b0b05845a1b6d21c3efa341bf287d0a86a275
53+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:20.000Z
2454 ## Source attribution added
2555 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
56+Source https://www.uregina.ca/policy/browse-policy/policy-ops-080-050.html snapshot 0bc7c384798934b20ad30a5b1954882ae77fb5a8e43aee814f4397e5a5641849
57+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:16.000Z
2658 ## Source attribution added
2759 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
60+Source https://www.uregina.ca/stories/2024/02/academic-integrity-and-artificial-intelligence.html snapshot 5668f134e50a7c202b2cd0acbe9d3f1e12a6e35c4843b54a0892c735d4a74a65
61+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-25T06:24:18.000Z

Modifications d'affirmations

8 Affirmation enregistrements

privacy

University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%Preuve1Languesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesen

security_review

For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%Preuve1Languesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%Preuve1Languesen

academic_integrity

The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%Preuve1Languesen

teaching

University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance89%Preuve1Languesen

academic_integrity

Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance86%Preuve1Languesen

academic_integrity

Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance84%Preuve1Languesen

Instantanés source

5 source attributions

Artificial Intelligence: Citing Generative AI

official_guidance Tracker checked at 25 mai 2026, 06:24

Hash de l'instantané
2cd38ba0cea8af0951c471e8832911c462d4a3a9363a7a5cab2cee0c8452f767

Artificial Intelligence: Using Generative AI

official_guidance Tracker checked at 25 mai 2026, 06:24

Hash de l'instantané
b1121fb5f16de36348403db0263b0b05845a1b6d21c3efa341bf287d0a86a275