Regina, Canada

University of Regina

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage8 reviewedEvidence-backed claims8Reviewed8Candidate0Official sources5Source languageenPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-regina.json

Policy profile

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence78%

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

University of Regina has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

8 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

University of Regina policy treats data used to develop, operate, share, manage, or record GenAI systems as institutional data that must align with the University's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and data handling standards.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: GenAI project and system data is institutional data governed by privacy and data handling rules.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Data used to develop algorithms or GenAI systems, and any data generated, shared, managed and/or recorded as part of an GenAI system's operation or algorithm, will be considered institutional data and must be managed in alignment with GOV-060-005 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy policy and the University's data handling standards.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: Formal GenAI operations policy for employee governance and operations use.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
This policy applies to the development, approval, use and management of GenAI software, systems, or platforms that may be used by University of Regina employees... All University use of GenAI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure and compliant with applicable laws and regulations.

Security Review

For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: GenAI projects require risk assessment, and university-wide or enterprise-data GenAI uses require IT project approval.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Any employee who is considering a GenAI project or system must identify, assess and analyze risks and opportunities... including privacy and security. Any University-wide GenAI project, tool, system or intended use of enterprise-level data requires approval through established IT project approval processes.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Regina CTL guidance says Turnitin is the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool, the AI-detection report is not conclusive proof of academic misconduct, and instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for AI detection.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: Turnitin is the institutionally adopted AI-detection tool; non-approved AI-detection tools are not permitted.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Due to the unreliability of AI-detection tools, and the possibility of false positives, the AI-detection report cannot be considered conclusive proof of academic misconduct... Turnitin is presently the only institutionally adopted plagiarism- and AI-detection tool and... instructors are not permitted to use non-approved tools for the purpose of AI-detection.

Academic Integrity

The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: Student AI use is course/instructor-specific, and unauthorized use can be academic misconduct.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Individual instructors may determine whether the use of AI will be permitted, and to what extent, when it comes to assigned course work... improper or unauthorized use of AI can constitute academic misconduct.

Teaching

University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: Faculty/instructor guidance recommends clear rules, disclosure, and privacy/IP protection for GenAI in coursework.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
It is strongly recommended that instructors incorporate a statement on the use of generative AI into course syllabi... Instructors should require students to disclose when and how they've incorporated AI into their coursework... Instructors should also endeavour to protect the privacy and intellectual property of students in any use of generative AI in teaching.

Academic Integrity

Archer Library's student-facing GenAI guidance tells students to check whether they have permission to use AI in their program or coursework, follow assignment instructions, verify GenAI output accuracy, and cite GenAI in their work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: Library guidance frames acceptable GenAI use around permission, assignment instructions, accuracy checks, and citation.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
These questions will guide you in determining whether or not use is acceptable: 1. Do you have permission to use AI in your program or course work? 2. Have you followed the assignment instructions? ... 4. Have you checked if the GenAI output is accurate? 5. Have you cited GenAI in your work?

Academic Integrity

Archer Library's GenAI citation guide says AI-generated materials should generally be treated as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication, while students should check with their instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and which style to use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%

Normalized value: Library citation guidance advises instructor confirmation and style-specific treatment for AI-generated materials.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
In general, though, you should treat AI-generated materials as a non-recoverable source and/or akin to personal communication... As always, please be sure to check with your instructor if in doubt about when to cite AI and what style to use.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

5 source attribution

Artificial Intelligence: Citing Generative AI

library.uregina.ca

Snapshot hash
2cd38ba0cea8af0951c471e8832911c462d4a3a9363a7a5cab2cee0c8452f767

Artificial Intelligence: Using Generative AI

library.uregina.ca

Snapshot hash
b1121fb5f16de36348403db0263b0b05845a1b6d21c3efa341bf287d0a86a275

Change log

Last checkedMay 25, 2026Last changedMay 25, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities