University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Plymouth, United Kingdom

University of Plymouth

ClassementQS World University Rankings 2026: =613Updated17 mai 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Affirmations révisées

3 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance says AI tools such as ChatGPT should generally not be used to generate the final version of assessed work, unless the coursework briefing clearly states an exception.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%

Valeur normalisée: faculty_science_engineering_ai_final_submission_general_restriction

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
17 mai 2026
Dernière modification
17 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
In general, AI tools such as ChatGPT should not be used in generating the final version of your work for submission. Any exceptions to this will be clearly stated in the coursework briefing.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
e19401d4…
Récupéré
17 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Faculty of Science and Engineering Guidelines for 2023-24 academic year

Academic Integrity

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance states that using ChatGPT or similar AI tools to generate assessed work for submission is considered plagiarism and a breach of the university's academic offences regulations.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%

Valeur normalisée: faculty_science_engineering_ai_generated_assessed_work_plagiarism

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
17 mai 2026
Dernière modification
17 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
Utilizing ChatGPT or similar AI tools to generate the assessed work that you submit is considered plagiarism and a breach of our university's academic offences regulations. Such practices can result in disciplinary action, up to and including a requirement to withdraw from the university.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
e19401d4…
Récupéré
17 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Consequences of misuse

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance describes limited AI uses such as brainstorming, planning, structuring work, proofreading, checking typos, generating example code, and exploring how code works.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance89%

Valeur normalisée: faculty_science_engineering_limited_planning_and_support_uses

Vérifié pour la dernière fois
17 mai 2026
Dernière modification
17 mai 2026

Preuve originale

Preuve 1
AI tools can be valuable for helping set out the parameters of arguments and providing examples of how to structure different pieces of work; AI can also be used to generate example code and also explore how other people's code works; AI can be used for proof-reading and checking for typos.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
e19401d4…
Récupéré
17 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
What can AI be useful for?

Source record

Sources officielles

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
Révisionagent reviewedConfiance91%Snapshot statusNon publiéJSONJSON public

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Plymouth AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 17, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-plymouth

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Journal des modifications ouvert