Plymouth, United Kingdom

University of Plymouth

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

3 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance says AI tools such as ChatGPT should generally not be used to generate the final version of assessed work, unless the coursework briefing clearly states an exception.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność91%

Wartość znormalizowana: faculty_science_engineering_ai_final_submission_general_restriction

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
In general, AI tools such as ChatGPT should not be used in generating the final version of your work for submission. Any exceptions to this will be clearly stated in the coursework briefing.

Academic Integrity

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance states that using ChatGPT or similar AI tools to generate assessed work for submission is considered plagiarism and a breach of the university's academic offences regulations.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność90%

Wartość znormalizowana: faculty_science_engineering_ai_generated_assessed_work_plagiarism

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Utilizing ChatGPT or similar AI tools to generate the assessed work that you submit is considered plagiarism and a breach of our university's academic offences regulations. Such practices can result in disciplinary action, up to and including a requirement to withdraw from the university.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance describes limited AI uses such as brainstorming, planning, structuring work, proofreading, checking typos, generating example code, and exploring how code works.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność89%

Wartość znormalizowana: faculty_science_engineering_limited_planning_and_support_uses

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
AI tools can be valuable for helping set out the parameters of arguments and providing examples of how to structure different pieces of work; AI can also be used to generate example code and also explore how other people's code works; AI can be used for proof-reading and checking for typos.

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność91%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Plymouth AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 17, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-plymouth

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian