Policy presence
University of Plymouth has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Plymouth, United Kingdom
University of Plymouth has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
University of Plymouth has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Plymouth has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
University of Plymouth has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Plymouth has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Plymouth has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Plymouth has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
University of Plymouth
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: faculty_science_engineering_ai_final_submission_general_restriction
Original evidence
Evidence 1In general, AI tools such as ChatGPT should not be used in generating the final version of your work for submission. Any exceptions to this will be clearly stated in the coursework briefing.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: faculty_science_engineering_ai_generated_assessed_work_plagiarism
Original evidence
Evidence 1Utilizing ChatGPT or similar AI tools to generate the assessed work that you submit is considered plagiarism and a breach of our university's academic offences regulations. Such practices can result in disciplinary action, up to and including a requirement to withdraw from the university.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: faculty_science_engineering_limited_planning_and_support_uses
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI tools can be valuable for helping set out the parameters of arguments and providing examples of how to structure different pieces of work; AI can also be used to generate example code and also explore how other people's code works; AI can be used for proof-reading and checking for typos.
0 machine or needs-review claim
1 source attribution
ecm-academics.plymouth.ac.uk