public-release-20260526-001
Comparé à public-release-20260524-001.
différentiel Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin public-release-20260526-001
Comparaison de public-release-20260524-001 avec public-release-20260526-001.
Journal des modifications
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 26 mai 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.
Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.
Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.
Comparaison de public-release-20260524-001 avec public-release-20260526-001.
1 diff de publication publique
Comparé à public-release-20260524-001.
Comparaison de public-release-20260524-001 avec public-release-20260526-001.
9 Affirmation enregistrements
Trinity College Dublin says specific uses of GenAI in an assessment must be disclosed, properly acknowledged, and referenced; students should explain what, when, and how they used GenAI.
Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI queries or instructions.
Trinity's GenAI assessment guidance states that submitting GenAI-generated content as a student's own work is considered plagiarism.
Trinity's College Statement treats AI and GenAI as relevant to teaching, learning, assessment and research while identifying risks including academic integrity, ethics and privacy.
Trinity Library guidance says GenAI use as a functional tool in academic work must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section, with minimum details including the system name and version, publisher, URL and context of use.
Trinity's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for scientific output, should cite GenAI usage in outputs, and should attend to privacy, confidentiality and intellectual-property issues when sharing sensitive information with AI tools.
Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says staff embedding GenAI should set clear parameters, support prompting practice, align use with learning outcomes, and ensure equitable access at no additional cost.
Trinity's Centre for Academic Practice states that policies on ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment are currently under development.
Trinity IT Services says AI tools such as ChatGPT raise information-security and data-protection considerations.
8 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:03
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:03
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:03
official_pdf Tracker checked at 27 juil. 2026, 02:40
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:03
official_guidance Source Last-Modified 22 mai 2026, 09:36
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:03
official_guidance Tracker checked at 13 mai 2026, 05:03