University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Journal des modifications

Durham University

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Révision: Révisé par un agentVérifié pour la dernière fois7 juil. 2026Dernière modification7 juil. 2026Affirmations16Sources5Dernière versionpublic-release-20260709-001Enregistrements de version1
Page universitaireJSON publicRapport mensuelIndex des universités

Résumé des modifications

Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.

Durham University currently has 16 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 7 juil. 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 5 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.

Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Durham University. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.

Catégories de différences

Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits5Preuve0Instantanés source1Texte source0Source ajoutée0Source supprimée0

Différentiel de version combinée

Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.

différentiel Durham University combined release

Comparaison de public-release-20260707-001 avec public-release-20260709-001.

+17-2
11 # Durham University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+teaching: Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).
5+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): All programmes will make use of a range of assessments clearly identified as either: No GenAI Allowed (including some assessments where AI use is not possible, such as viva); Selective, where it will be specified how GenAI may be used; Allowed, where students may choose whether and how to use GenAI; Embedded, where using GenAI is required.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+research: Senate approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees alongside the main GenAI policy in June 2026.
10+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): Senate also approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+source_status: Durham University's GenAI policy for learning, teaching and assessment was approved by Senate in June 2026.
15+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): An update to our GenAI policy was approved by our academic governing body Senate in June 2026.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: Durham requires all programmes to be updated to ensure students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
20+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): Programmes are being updated to ensure that students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+ai_tool_treatment: Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
25+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): our staff can choose whether and how to use GenAI, being open and transparent about this. They must operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
1227 ## Source snapshot hash changed
1328 The same source URL has a different snapshot hash. This may reflect policy text, page layout, navigation, or metadata changes; it is not by itself a policy change.
14-Source https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/ snapshot 221e2a570ee0f05193c1c10adf79de564f2d41ecbc1b47022911bc621811ff5b
15-Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
29+Source https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/ snapshot f14baa18ffb070e305ae8913e36f815afde6b9f0c16744a11e61d0f925581531
30+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z

Historique des versions

1 diff de publication publique

public-release-20260709-001

Comparé à public-release-20260707-001.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits5Instantanés source1Texte source0
Diff de versionDifférences JSON

différentiel Durham University public-release-20260709-001

Comparaison de public-release-20260707-001 avec public-release-20260709-001.

+17-2
11 # Durham University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+teaching: Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).
5+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): All programmes will make use of a range of assessments clearly identified as either: No GenAI Allowed (including some assessments where AI use is not possible, such as viva); Selective, where it will be specified how GenAI may be used; Allowed, where students may choose whether and how to use GenAI; Embedded, where using GenAI is required.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+research: Senate approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees alongside the main GenAI policy in June 2026.
10+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): Senate also approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+source_status: Durham University's GenAI policy for learning, teaching and assessment was approved by Senate in June 2026.
15+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): An update to our GenAI policy was approved by our academic governing body Senate in June 2026.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: Durham requires all programmes to be updated to ensure students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
20+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): Programmes are being updated to ensure that students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+ai_tool_treatment: Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
25+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): our staff can choose whether and how to use GenAI, being open and transparent about this. They must operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
1227 ## Source snapshot hash changed
1328 The same source URL has a different snapshot hash. This may reflect policy text, page layout, navigation, or metadata changes; it is not by itself a policy change.
14-Source https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/ snapshot 221e2a570ee0f05193c1c10adf79de564f2d41ecbc1b47022911bc621811ff5b
15-Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
29+Source https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/ snapshot f14baa18ffb070e305ae8913e36f815afde6b9f0c16744a11e61d0f925581531
30+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z

Modifications d'affirmations

16 Affirmation enregistrements

teaching

Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%Preuve1Languesen-GB

source_status

Durham University's GenAI policy for learning, teaching and assessment was approved by Senate in June 2026.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%Preuve1Languesen-GB

teaching

Durham requires all programmes to be updated to ensure students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%Preuve1Languesen-GB

research

Senate approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees alongside the main GenAI policy in June 2026.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance91%Preuve1Languesen-GB

academic_integrity

For Common Awards summative assessments, Durham guidance says students must not use generative AI to create substantive content that they present as their own creation.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance99%Preuve1Languesen-GB

source_status

Durham Common Awards AI academic-misconduct policy is scoped to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance98%Preuve1Languesen-GB

academic_integrity

For Common Awards students, Durham guidance says students must not provide generative AI with others' material unless it is public-domain material, permitted material, or protected from training use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance98%Preuve1Languesen-GB

academic_integrity

The Durham Common Awards page says its AI policy requires students to paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submission.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%Preuve1Languesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Durham Global Opportunities guidance says using generative AI in Global Opportunities applications is unadvisable and may negatively affect an application.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%Preuve1Languesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Durham Common Awards guidance says some limited uses of generative AI do not count as academic misconduct if work remains the student's own, AI use is acknowledged where required, and caution is demonstrated.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%Preuve1Languesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Durham Global Opportunities guidance says asking an AI tool to proofread in British English would be appropriate where the original text was generated by the human applicant.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%Preuve1Languesen-GB

source_status

Durham's public DCAD generative-AI resources page lists an internal Institutional Policy on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Learning, Teaching and Assessment dated June 2025.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesen-GB

teaching

DCAD assessment guidance says marking criteria should be reviewed alongside assessment redesign in light of generative AI.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesen-GB

teaching

DCAD assessment guidance says actively addressing generative AI in assessment briefs can promote open dialogue with students and help assessments reflect programme learning outcomes and disciplinary practices.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesen-GB

teaching

DCAD assessment guidance says starting an iterative programme-level discussion about learning outcomes and generative AI is highly recommended rather than ignoring already occurring shifts.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance93%Preuve1Languesen-GB

Instantanés source

5 source attributions