public-release-20260709-001
与 public-release-20260707-001 相比。
Durham University public-release-20260709-001 差异
将 public-release-20260707-001 与 public-release-20260709-001 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
Durham University currently has 16 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月7日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 5 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Durham University。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
将 public-release-20260707-001 与 public-release-20260709-001 进行比较。
1 公开发布差异
与 public-release-20260707-001 相比。
将 public-release-20260707-001 与 public-release-20260709-001 进行比较。
16 声明 条记录
Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).
Durham University's GenAI policy for learning, teaching and assessment was approved by Senate in June 2026.
Durham requires all programmes to be updated to ensure students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
Senate approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees alongside the main GenAI policy in June 2026.
For Common Awards summative assessments, Durham guidance says students must not use generative AI to create substantive content that they present as their own creation.
Durham Common Awards AI academic-misconduct policy is scoped to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules.
For Common Awards students, Durham guidance says students must not provide generative AI with others' material unless it is public-domain material, permitted material, or protected from training use.
The Durham Common Awards page says its AI policy requires students to paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submission.
Durham Global Opportunities guidance says using generative AI in Global Opportunities applications is unadvisable and may negatively affect an application.
Durham Common Awards guidance says some limited uses of generative AI do not count as academic misconduct if work remains the student's own, AI use is acknowledged where required, and caution is demonstrated.
Durham Global Opportunities guidance says asking an AI tool to proofread in British English would be appropriate where the original text was generated by the human applicant.
Durham's public DCAD generative-AI resources page lists an internal Institutional Policy on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Learning, Teaching and Assessment dated June 2025.
DCAD assessment guidance says marking criteria should be reviewed alongside assessment redesign in light of generative AI.
DCAD assessment guidance says actively addressing generative AI in assessment briefs can promote open dialogue with students and help assessments reflect programme learning outcomes and disciplinary practices.
DCAD assessment guidance says starting an iterative programme-level discussion about learning outcomes and generative AI is highly recommended rather than ignoring already occurring shifts.
5 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 02:12
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 02:12
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 02:12
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 02:12
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月7日 13:18