public-release-20260709-001
Dibandingkan dengan public-release-20260707-001.
Durham University public-release-20260709-001 perbezaan
Membandingkan public-release-20260707-001 dengan public-release-20260709-001.
Log perubahan
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.
Durham University currently has 16 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 7 Jul 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 5 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.
Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk Durham University. Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.
Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.
Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.
Membandingkan public-release-20260707-001 dengan public-release-20260709-001.
1 perbezaan pelepasan awam
Dibandingkan dengan public-release-20260707-001.
Membandingkan public-release-20260707-001 dengan public-release-20260709-001.
16 rekod Tuntut
Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).
Durham University's GenAI policy for learning, teaching and assessment was approved by Senate in June 2026.
Durham requires all programmes to be updated to ensure students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
Senate approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees alongside the main GenAI policy in June 2026.
For Common Awards summative assessments, Durham guidance says students must not use generative AI to create substantive content that they present as their own creation.
Durham Common Awards AI academic-misconduct policy is scoped to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules.
For Common Awards students, Durham guidance says students must not provide generative AI with others' material unless it is public-domain material, permitted material, or protected from training use.
The Durham Common Awards page says its AI policy requires students to paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submission.
Durham Global Opportunities guidance says using generative AI in Global Opportunities applications is unadvisable and may negatively affect an application.
Durham Common Awards guidance says some limited uses of generative AI do not count as academic misconduct if work remains the student's own, AI use is acknowledged where required, and caution is demonstrated.
Durham Global Opportunities guidance says asking an AI tool to proofread in British English would be appropriate where the original text was generated by the human applicant.
Durham's public DCAD generative-AI resources page lists an internal Institutional Policy on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Learning, Teaching and Assessment dated June 2025.
DCAD assessment guidance says marking criteria should be reviewed alongside assessment redesign in light of generative AI.
DCAD assessment guidance says actively addressing generative AI in assessment briefs can promote open dialogue with students and help assessments reflect programme learning outcomes and disciplinary practices.
DCAD assessment guidance says starting an iterative programme-level discussion about learning outcomes and generative AI is highly recommended rather than ignoring already occurring shifts.
5 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 14 Mei 2026, 2:12 PG
official_guidance Tracker checked at 14 Mei 2026, 2:12 PG
official_guidance Tracker checked at 14 Mei 2026, 2:12 PG
official_guidance Tracker checked at 14 Mei 2026, 2:12 PG
official_guidance Tracker checked at 7 Jul 2026, 1:18 PTG