Log perubahan

Durham University

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Ringkasan perubahan

Kesegaran rekod awam semasa dan keadaan semakan.

Durham University currently has 16 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 7 Jul 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 5 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.

Halaman ini menggabungkan semua perbezaan pelepasan awam untuk Durham University. Snapshot pelepasan individu kekal boleh diakses dari URL khusus pelepasan mereka.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Tuntutan diekstrak baharu adalah penambahan penjejak dan tidak semestinya diterbitkan baru-baru ini oleh universiti. Perubahan snapshot sumber menunjukkan perubahan hesh untuk URL sumber yang sama dan bukan merupakan perubahan dasar secara langsung.

Kategori perbezaan

Klasifikasi semantik untuk perbezaan keluaran ini.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu5Bukti0Snapshot sumber1Teks sumber0Sumber ditambah0Sumber dialih keluar0

Perbezaan pelepasan gabungan

Perbezaan penjejak bersatu dijana daripada semua snapshot pelepasan awam untuk universiti ini.

Durham University combined release perbezaan

Membandingkan public-release-20260707-001 dengan public-release-20260709-001.

+17-2
11 # Durham University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+teaching: Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).
5+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): All programmes will make use of a range of assessments clearly identified as either: No GenAI Allowed (including some assessments where AI use is not possible, such as viva); Selective, where it will be specified how GenAI may be used; Allowed, where students may choose whether and how to use GenAI; Embedded, where using GenAI is required.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+research: Senate approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees alongside the main GenAI policy in June 2026.
10+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): Senate also approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+source_status: Durham University's GenAI policy for learning, teaching and assessment was approved by Senate in June 2026.
15+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): An update to our GenAI policy was approved by our academic governing body Senate in June 2026.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: Durham requires all programmes to be updated to ensure students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
20+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): Programmes are being updated to ensure that students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+ai_tool_treatment: Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
25+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): our staff can choose whether and how to use GenAI, being open and transparent about this. They must operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
1227 ## Source snapshot hash changed
1328 The same source URL has a different snapshot hash. This may reflect policy text, page layout, navigation, or metadata changes; it is not by itself a policy change.
14-Source https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/ snapshot 221e2a570ee0f05193c1c10adf79de564f2d41ecbc1b47022911bc621811ff5b
15-Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
29+Source https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/ snapshot f14baa18ffb070e305ae8913e36f815afde6b9f0c16744a11e61d0f925581531
30+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z

Sejarah keluaran

1 perbezaan pelepasan awam

public-release-20260709-001

Dibandingkan dengan public-release-20260707-001.

Teks dasar0Diekstrak baharu5Snapshot sumber1Teks sumber0

Durham University public-release-20260709-001 perbezaan

Membandingkan public-release-20260707-001 dengan public-release-20260709-001.

+17-2
11 # Durham University AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+teaching: Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).
5+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): All programmes will make use of a range of assessments clearly identified as either: No GenAI Allowed (including some assessments where AI use is not possible, such as viva); Selective, where it will be specified how GenAI may be used; Allowed, where students may choose whether and how to use GenAI; Embedded, where using GenAI is required.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+research: Senate approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees alongside the main GenAI policy in June 2026.
10+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): Senate also approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+source_status: Durham University's GenAI policy for learning, teaching and assessment was approved by Senate in June 2026.
15+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): An update to our GenAI policy was approved by our academic governing body Senate in June 2026.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+teaching: Durham requires all programmes to be updated to ensure students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
20+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): Programmes are being updated to ensure that students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
1022 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1123 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
24+ai_tool_treatment: Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
25+Evidence (en-GB, f14baa18ffb0): our staff can choose whether and how to use GenAI, being open and transparent about this. They must operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.
26+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
1227 ## Source snapshot hash changed
1328 The same source URL has a different snapshot hash. This may reflect policy text, page layout, navigation, or metadata changes; it is not by itself a policy change.
14-Source https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/ snapshot 221e2a570ee0f05193c1c10adf79de564f2d41ecbc1b47022911bc621811ff5b
15-Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z
29+Source https://dcad-resourcebank.webspace.durham.ac.uk/2024/07/16/generative-ai-in-learning-teaching-assessment/ snapshot f14baa18ffb070e305ae8913e36f815afde6b9f0c16744a11e61d0f925581531
30+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-07T13:18:52.000Z

Perubahan tuntutan

16 rekod Tuntut

teaching

Durham University categorises student assessments into four GenAI-use tiers: No GenAI Allowed, Selective (specified how GenAI may be used), Allowed (students may choose whether and how to use GenAI), and Embedded (using GenAI is required).

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

source_status

Durham University's GenAI policy for learning, teaching and assessment was approved by Senate in June 2026.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

teaching

Durham requires all programmes to be updated to ensure students have a mix of GenAI-secure and GenAI-open assessments.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

research

Senate approved a specific policy for the use of GenAI in postgraduate research degrees alongside the main GenAI policy in June 2026.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan91%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

academic_integrity

For Common Awards summative assessments, Durham guidance says students must not use generative AI to create substantive content that they present as their own creation.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan99%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

source_status

Durham Common Awards AI academic-misconduct policy is scoped to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan98%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

academic_integrity

For Common Awards students, Durham guidance says students must not provide generative AI with others' material unless it is public-domain material, permitted material, or protected from training use.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan98%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

academic_integrity

The Durham Common Awards page says its AI policy requires students to paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submission.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan97%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Durham Global Opportunities guidance says using generative AI in Global Opportunities applications is unadvisable and may negatively affect an application.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan97%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Durham Common Awards guidance says some limited uses of generative AI do not count as academic misconduct if work remains the student's own, AI use is acknowledged where required, and caution is demonstrated.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan96%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Durham Global Opportunities guidance says asking an AI tool to proofread in British English would be appropriate where the original text was generated by the human applicant.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan95%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

source_status

Durham's public DCAD generative-AI resources page lists an internal Institutional Policy on Generative Artificial Intelligence for Learning, Teaching and Assessment dated June 2025.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

teaching

DCAD assessment guidance says marking criteria should be reviewed alongside assessment redesign in light of generative AI.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

teaching

DCAD assessment guidance says actively addressing generative AI in assessment briefs can promote open dialogue with students and help assessments reflect programme learning outcomes and disciplinary practices.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan94%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

teaching

DCAD assessment guidance says starting an iterative programme-level discussion about learning outcomes and generative AI is highly recommended rather than ignoring already occurring shifts.

Semakan: Disemak oleh ejenKeyakinan93%Bukti1Bahasaen-GB

Snapshot sumber

5 source attributions