University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPLES

Alzette, Luxembourg

University of Luxembourg

ClasificaciónQS World University Rankings 2026: =381Updated16 may 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%

Valor normalizado: genai_disclosure_course_specific

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
b25b8a04…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Guidelines for learning; Disclosure requirements

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
b25b8a04…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
AI tools supported by the University of Luxembourg

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza89%

Valor normalizado: non_permitted_ai_practices

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
b25b8a04…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Risks and limitations; Non-permitted AI practices

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza87%

Valor normalizado: chatbot_assignment_disclosure

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
e0b4f0f9…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Chatbots and citations - Can they be cited in an academic assignment?

Academic Integrity

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza86%

Valor normalizado: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure

Última verificación
16 may 2026
Último cambio
16 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
e0b4f0f9…
Recuperado
16 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Consequences of illicit chatbot use

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza91%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios