Qué hacer
- Confirm the current course and assessment instructions.
- Read the saved tool audience before seeking access.
- Check where and how permitted use must be disclosed.
Alzette, Luxembourg
University of Luxembourg
Student guide · Task scope and procedure
Read the saved guidance and confirm the current course rule.
Current official guidance could not be checked for this preview. Saved claims retain their earlier evidence; they do not certify current course permission or student UniGPT access.
La guía siguiente está en inglés; las pruebas oficiales conservan su idioma original.
Aún no hay un resumen completo de las normas para estudiantes; consulta las afirmaciones y fuentes recopiladas.
Alcance y transición
Current official guidance could not be checked for this preview. Saved claims retain their earlier evidence; they do not certify current course permission or student UniGPT access.
Qué evitar
- Do not pass generated output off as your own.
- Do not turn staff UniGPT access into student access.
- Do not treat saved evidence as current course approval.
Herramientas de IA y acceso
El acceso no autoriza su uso en una evaluación. Comprueba las reglas de la tarea, los usuarios elegibles y las restricciones de datos.
Registro archivado; consulta la fuente oficial para el acceso actual. Los detalles de acceso y las citas conservan su idioma original.
- Microsoft CopilotHerramienta mencionada; acceso institucional no confirmadoDisponibilidad no confirmada
Acceso, condiciones y evidencia oficial
Fuente oficial 1 ↗Cita original
The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot.
- UniGPTHerramienta mencionada; acceso institucional no confirmadoDisponibilidad no confirmada
Acceso, condiciones y evidencia oficial
Fuente oficial 1 ↗Cita original
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Reviewed record
Afirmaciones revisadas
Afirmaciones revisadas: 5
Integridad académicaAfirmaciones revisadas: 4
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Valor normalizado: genai_disclosure_course_specific
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1The use of Generative AI must be disclosed in accordance with the specific guidelines communicated for each course and assessment.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Valor normalizado: non_permitted_ai_practices
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1Unless explicitly authorised by the course guidelines, the following uses are non-permitted and may constitute academic misconduct: Submitting text, code, images, or other outputs generated fully or partly by AI as if they were entirely one's own work... Generating or altering data to create fake datasets, results, quotes, references, or evidence... Citing non-existent sources supplied by AI... Running outputs through multiple AI tools to conceal AI involvement.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Valor normalizado: chatbot_assignment_disclosure
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1If you decide to use a chatbot for an assignment, be sure to adhere to the principles of academic integrity. This means properly citing the chatbot as a source and disclosing in which parts of the text it has been used and how it has influenced the text.
Academic Integrity
University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says a substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use triggers disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Valor normalizado: unauthorized_chatbot_use_disciplinary_procedure
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1A substantiated suspicion of unauthorized chatbot use in an assignment will trigger the disciplinary procedure for academic fraud and plagiarism.
Reglas para herramientas de IAAfirmaciones revisadas: 1
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Valor normalizado: microsoft_copilot_supported_unigpt_staff
Evidencia original
Evidencia 1The University provides Microsoft Copilot as its official supported chatbot. Students are encouraged to prioritise this tool, as it is supported within the University environment and offers stronger institutional safeguards than other public platforms. In February 2026, the University of Luxembourg launched UniGPT... At present, access to UniGPT is limited to University staff.
Source record
Fuentes oficiales
Fuentes: 2
Abrir la lista de fuentes oficiales
Chatbots and student assessment
uni.lu
- URL de la fuente
- https://www.uni.lu/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2023/09/Chatbots_and_student_assessment_FAQ_for_students_08062023.pdf
- Hash de la instantánea
- e0b4f0f9…
Guidelines on the Use of Generative AI for Teaching and Learning
uni.lu
- URL de la fuente
- https://www.uni.lu/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2026/02/25170716/2026-Guidelines-AI-I2TL-16022026.pdf
- Hash de la instantánea
- b25b8a04…
Información, JSON y cita
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Luxembourg AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-luxembourg
Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.
Abrir registro de cambiosSaved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.