University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPLES

Barcelona, Spain

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

ClasificaciónQS World University Rankings 2026: 172Updated15 may 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

5 reviewed claims

Investigación

The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%

Valor normalizado: UAB Publications Service AI policy restricts AI authorship and requires disclosure in articles

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
The IA cannot be listed as author or co-author of an article. AI should not be used to generate hypotheses, interpret data or formulate conclusions without the supervision and validation of the authors. Failure to disclose the use of AI in the article is considered academic misconduct and may result in rejection of the proposal or retraction of the published article.

Vista localizada only

The UAB Publications Service policy restricts AI authorship, requires author supervision/validation, and treats nondisclosure as academic misconduct for articles.

Idioma de la fuente
English (en)
Hash de instantánea
5fde6088…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Sections: Unaccepted uses; Disclosure

Academic Integrity

UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%

Valor normalizado: UAB AI guide treats AI as a tool/source, not an academic author

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
La IA no pot tenir autoria acadèmica o legal. La IA és una eina, no un subjecte amb intencionalitat ni responsabilitat. L’autoria correspon a la persona que utilitza la IA i decideix què n’incorpora. A la citació, s’indica l’eina com a font, no com a autor.

Vista localizada only

UAB Libraries says AI is a tool rather than an author, and that the person using AI remains responsible for what is incorporated.

Idioma de la fuente
ca
Hash de instantánea
fdd1ca36…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Section: Autoria i atribucio de la IA

Privacidad

UAB Libraries' responsible-use guidance for AI says privacy and data security require reviewing service terms, avoiding leakage of institutional information, and ensuring compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%

Valor normalizado: UAB AI guide includes privacy, institutional data leakage, and GDPR cautions

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Privacitat i seguretat de les dades. La IA es basa principalment en dades obertes d’internet, però també en informació derivada de l’ús de les pròpies eines. Cal: revisar els termes d’ús dels serveis; evitar la filtració d’informació institucional; garantir el compliment del RGPD i altres normatives.

Vista localizada only

The UAB guide says AI privacy/data security requires checking service terms, avoiding institutional-information leaks, and complying with GDPR.

Idioma de la fuente
ca
Hash de instantánea
bfc2aa9f…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Section: Privacitat i seguretat de les dades

Enseñanza

UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%

Valor normalizado: UAB has official AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, framed as provisional and reflective

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Aquest document n’és un primer resultat provisional. Un cop constituït el grup de treball amb professorat de diferents centres, s’ha elaborat aquest document, que serà un document viu, perquè la tecnologia a la qual es refereix evoluciona gairebé a temps real i convindrà anar-lo actualitzant regularment.

Vista localizada only

The UAB positioning document is framed as a provisional, living document that will need regular updates.

Idioma de la fuente
ca
Hash de instantánea
a8a5baaf…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Section: Presentacio

Enseñanza

In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza92%

Valor normalizado: UAB teaching guidance recommends rethinking assessments around AI-generated output

Última verificación
15 may 2026
Último cambio
15 may 2026

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
La irrupció de ChatGPT i altres eines similars obliga a replantejar allò que es demana que provi o evidenciï cada estudiant. En general, tot allò que la màquina pot fer bé i de pressa no hauria de formar part de la proposta avaluativa, perquè s’estaria avaluant, en realitat, una producció artificial.

Vista localizada only

UAB's teaching guidance says ChatGPT-like tools require rethinking what assessments ask students to evidence.

Idioma de la fuente
ca
Hash de instantánea
a8a5baaf…
Recuperado
15 may 2026
Localizador de evidencia
Section: Impacte de la IA en la docencia i l'avaluacio

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza96%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/universitat-autonoma-de-barcelona

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios