Hoboken, United States

Stevens Institute of Technology

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection is listed for Stevens Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%

Valor normalizado: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection","description":"Stevens makes the browser version of Microsoft Copilot with data protection available to all Stevens users.","howToObtain":"Use the browser version with a Stevens account in Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.","costToUser":"Not stated by the official page.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Stevens describes Microsoft Copilot with data protection as available to all Stevens users through the browser version.

Vista localizada only

Stevens describes Microsoft Copilot with data protection as available to all Stevens users through the browser version.

Privacidad

Stevens AI data-classification guidance treats public data as permissible for AI use, non-public Stevens data as permissible only with licensed AI tools while logged in with a Stevens account, and restricted data as prohibited for AI use.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%

Valor normalizado: public_permissible_non_public_licensed_tools_only_restricted_prohibited

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
PublicThis data is openly accessible and can be shared without restrictions. ... Permissible for AI Use ... Non-PublicThis data is not intended for public access but can be used internally within Stevens. ... Use of Stevens data is only permissible with licensedAI tools, including Microsoft Copilot for Web with Data Protection and Zoom AI Companion, while logged in via a Stevens account. ... RestrictedThis data is highly confidential and its use is strictly controlled. ... Prohibited for AI Use

Security Review

Stevens IT guidance says that, effective May 1, 2025, Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai were disabled from joining Zoom meetings hosted by Stevens users, and strongly recommends not using third-party AI bots in Zoom meetings.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%

Valor normalizado: fireflies_otter_disabled_and_third_party_zoom_ai_bots_not_recommended

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Effective May 1, 2025, the Division of IT disabled the ability for Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai to join Zoom meetings hosted by Stevens users. ... It is strongly recommended that third-party AI bots not be used in Zoom meetings. Use Stevens-supported apps and tools such as Zoom AI Companion and Zoom Live Transcription for a more secure and reliable meeting experience.

Security Review

Stevens guidance says new AI uses in work should align with Stevens security, privacy, and relevant policies, and should seek prior approval from a supervisor or department chair.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: new_ai_uses_seek_prior_supervisor_or_department_chair_approval

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
When using Artificial Intelligence (AI), ensure it aligns with Stevens' Information Security Policy, Privacy Policy, and any other relevant policies. Always consider the risks and ethical implications, and seek prior approval from your supervisor and/or department chair for new AI uses in your work.

Security Review

Stevens guidance identifies certain AI use cases, including grading or assessment of student work, recruitment, personnel or disciplinary decision-making, legal analysis, facial recognition security tools, and non-public uses of non-licensed AI tools with click-through agreements, as requiring additional review and consideration before AI use.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: high_risk_ai_use_cases_require_additional_review

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Certain use cases, such as grading or assessment of student work, recruitment, personnel, or disciplinary decision-making, legal analysis or advice, security tools using facial recognition, and any non-public use of non-licensed AI tools with click-through agreements, requires additional review and consideration prior to use in AI.

Ai Tool Treatment

Stevens OneIT recommends Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection and Zoom AI Companion for users seeking a generative AI solution, and lists both tools as available to students, faculty, and staff.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: oneit_recommends_copilot_data_protection_and_zoom_ai_companion

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection ... The web browser version ... is available for all students, faculty, and staff. ... Zoom AI Companion ... Availability Students, Faculty, Staff ... The OneIT team currently recommends using Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection and Zoom AI Companion if you are looking for a generative AI solution.

Enseñanza

Stevens teaching guidance tells instructors to establish a clear course policy on whether and how students may use AI tools, and to communicate expectations and guidelines in the syllabus when generative AI is permitted in certain areas.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza86%

Valor normalizado: instructors_establish_course_ai_policy_and_syllabus_expectations

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Establish a clear course policy on whether and how students may use AI tools in your class. If generative AI is permitted in certain areas, clearly communicate your expectations and guidelines in the syllabus. ... Outline the types of activities where AI is allowed and recommend appropriate tools.

Academic Integrity

Stevens teaching guidance cautions that AI detection tools are not 100 percent accurate and says instructors should not use AI detection tools as a definitive way to gauge misconduct.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza86%

Valor normalizado: ai_detection_tools_not_definitive_for_misconduct

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
While this feature can help identify potential AI-generated content, it is important to understand its limitations. There are issues with false positives and bias with these tools. No AI detection tool is 100% accurate. Instructors should not use AI detection tools as a definitive way to gauge misconduct.

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza97%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Stevens Institute of Technology AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/stevens-institute-of-technology

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios