Policy presence
Stevens Institute of Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Hoboken, United States
Stevens Institute of Technology
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Stevens Institute of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
Stevens Institute of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
Stevens Institute of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Stevens Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Approved tools
Stevens Institute of Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
Stevens Institute of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
Stevens Institute of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
Stevens Institute of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
AI tools
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Stevens AI data-classification guidance treats public data as permissible for AI use, non-public Stevens data as permissible only with licensed AI tools while logged in with a Stevens account, and restricted data as prohibited for AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: public_permissible_non_public_licensed_tools_only_restricted_prohibited
Original evidence
Evidence 1PublicThis data is openly accessible and can be shared without restrictions. ... Permissible for AI Use ... Non-PublicThis data is not intended for public access but can be used internally within Stevens. ... Use of Stevens data is only permissible with licensedAI tools, including Microsoft Copilot for Web with Data Protection and Zoom AI Companion, while logged in via a Stevens account. ... RestrictedThis data is highly confidential and its use is strictly controlled. ... Prohibited for AI Use
Security Review
Stevens IT guidance says that, effective May 1, 2025, Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai were disabled from joining Zoom meetings hosted by Stevens users, and strongly recommends not using third-party AI bots in Zoom meetings.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: fireflies_otter_disabled_and_third_party_zoom_ai_bots_not_recommended
Original evidence
Evidence 1Effective May 1, 2025, the Division of IT disabled the ability for Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai to join Zoom meetings hosted by Stevens users. ... It is strongly recommended that third-party AI bots not be used in Zoom meetings. Use Stevens-supported apps and tools such as Zoom AI Companion and Zoom Live Transcription for a more secure and reliable meeting experience.
Security Review
Stevens guidance says new AI uses in work should align with Stevens security, privacy, and relevant policies, and should seek prior approval from a supervisor or department chair.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: new_ai_uses_seek_prior_supervisor_or_department_chair_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1When using Artificial Intelligence (AI), ensure it aligns with Stevens' Information Security Policy, Privacy Policy, and any other relevant policies. Always consider the risks and ethical implications, and seek prior approval from your supervisor and/or department chair for new AI uses in your work.
Security Review
Stevens guidance identifies certain AI use cases, including grading or assessment of student work, recruitment, personnel or disciplinary decision-making, legal analysis, facial recognition security tools, and non-public uses of non-licensed AI tools with click-through agreements, as requiring additional review and consideration before AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: high_risk_ai_use_cases_require_additional_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1Certain use cases, such as grading or assessment of student work, recruitment, personnel, or disciplinary decision-making, legal analysis or advice, security tools using facial recognition, and any non-public use of non-licensed AI tools with click-through agreements, requires additional review and consideration prior to use in AI.
Ai Tool Treatment
Stevens OneIT recommends Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection and Zoom AI Companion for users seeking a generative AI solution, and lists both tools as available to students, faculty, and staff.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: oneit_recommends_copilot_data_protection_and_zoom_ai_companion
Original evidence
Evidence 1Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection ... The web browser version ... is available for all students, faculty, and staff. ... Zoom AI Companion ... Availability Students, Faculty, Staff ... The OneIT team currently recommends using Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection and Zoom AI Companion if you are looking for a generative AI solution.
Teaching
Stevens teaching guidance tells instructors to establish a clear course policy on whether and how students may use AI tools, and to communicate expectations and guidelines in the syllabus when generative AI is permitted in certain areas.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: instructors_establish_course_ai_policy_and_syllabus_expectations
Original evidence
Evidence 1Establish a clear course policy on whether and how students may use AI tools in your class. If generative AI is permitted in certain areas, clearly communicate your expectations and guidelines in the syllabus. ... Outline the types of activities where AI is allowed and recommend appropriate tools.
Academic Integrity
Stevens teaching guidance cautions that AI detection tools are not 100 percent accurate and says instructors should not use AI detection tools as a definitive way to gauge misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_detection_tools_not_definitive_for_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1While this feature can help identify potential AI-generated content, it is important to understand its limitations. There are issues with false positives and bias with these tools. No AI detection tool is 100% accurate. Instructors should not use AI detection tools as a definitive way to gauge misconduct.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
5 source attribution
Artificial Intelligence
stevens.edu
Exploring the Role and Use of Generative AI Technology in Teaching
support.stevens.edu
Generative AI Tools
support.stevens.edu
Guidance for Appropriate Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools at Stevens
assets.stevens.edu
Zoom AI Companion and Security Considerations for Third-Party AI Bots for Zoom Meetings
support.stevens.edu