Policy presence
Stevens Institute of Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Hoboken, United States
Stevens Institute of Technology has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 7 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.
v1 public contract
Stevens Institute of Technology has 7 source-backed AI policy claims from 5 official source attributions, including 7 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: Stevens Institute of Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank =673.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Stevens Institute of Technology as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 5 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/stevens-institute-of-technology.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Stevens Institute of Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Stevens Institute of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Stevens Institute of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Stevens Institute of Technology has 4 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Stevens Institute of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Stevens Institute of Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Stevens Institute of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Stevens Institute of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Stevens Institute of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Normalized value: public_permissible_non_public_licensed_tools_only_restricted_prohibited
Original evidence
Evidence 1PublicThis data is openly accessible and can be shared without restrictions. ... Permissible for AI Use ... Non-PublicThis data is not intended for public access but can be used internally within Stevens. ... Use of Stevens data is only permissible with licensedAI tools, including Microsoft Copilot for Web with Data Protection and Zoom AI Companion, while logged in via a Stevens account. ... RestrictedThis data is highly confidential and its use is strictly controlled. ... Prohibited for AI Use
Security Review
Normalized value: fireflies_otter_disabled_and_third_party_zoom_ai_bots_not_recommended
Original evidence
Evidence 1Effective May 1, 2025, the Division of IT disabled the ability for Fireflies.ai and Otter.ai to join Zoom meetings hosted by Stevens users. ... It is strongly recommended that third-party AI bots not be used in Zoom meetings. Use Stevens-supported apps and tools such as Zoom AI Companion and Zoom Live Transcription for a more secure and reliable meeting experience.
Security Review
Normalized value: new_ai_uses_seek_prior_supervisor_or_department_chair_approval
Original evidence
Evidence 1When using Artificial Intelligence (AI), ensure it aligns with Stevens' Information Security Policy, Privacy Policy, and any other relevant policies. Always consider the risks and ethical implications, and seek prior approval from your supervisor and/or department chair for new AI uses in your work.
Security Review
Normalized value: high_risk_ai_use_cases_require_additional_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1Certain use cases, such as grading or assessment of student work, recruitment, personnel, or disciplinary decision-making, legal analysis or advice, security tools using facial recognition, and any non-public use of non-licensed AI tools with click-through agreements, requires additional review and consideration prior to use in AI.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: oneit_recommends_copilot_data_protection_and_zoom_ai_companion
Original evidence
Evidence 1Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection ... The web browser version ... is available for all students, faculty, and staff. ... Zoom AI Companion ... Availability Students, Faculty, Staff ... The OneIT team currently recommends using Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection and Zoom AI Companion if you are looking for a generative AI solution.
Teaching
Normalized value: instructors_establish_course_ai_policy_and_syllabus_expectations
Original evidence
Evidence 1Establish a clear course policy on whether and how students may use AI tools in your class. If generative AI is permitted in certain areas, clearly communicate your expectations and guidelines in the syllabus. ... Outline the types of activities where AI is allowed and recommend appropriate tools.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: ai_detection_tools_not_definitive_for_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1While this feature can help identify potential AI-generated content, it is important to understand its limitations. There are issues with false positives and bias with these tools. No AI detection tool is 100% accurate. Instructors should not use AI detection tools as a definitive way to gauge misconduct.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
5 source attribution
stevens.edu
support.stevens.edu
support.stevens.edu
assets.stevens.edu
support.stevens.edu
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.