academic_integrity
UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Registro de cambios
University of Johannesburg
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Resumen de cambios
Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.
University of Johannesburg currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para University of Johannesburg. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.
Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.
Categorías de diferencias
Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.
Diferencias de versión combinadas
Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.
Universidad of Johannesburg combined release diferencias
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+6-0
11 # University of Johannesburg AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.
3+Evidence (en, 7b2880ce8629): To present the work of someone else or of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one’s own, is academic dishonesty. To mitigate the risks of academic misconduct, in the context of generative AI, it is recommended that: students and researchers be transparent and sign a declaration that the work is their own.
4+academic_integrity: UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
5+Evidence (en, 3bb6efba73e2): How you use generative AI depends on your course, department, or faculty rules, as well as UJ policy. Familiarise yourself with the rules and requirements before you produce assignments and assessments.
6+teaching: UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
7+Evidence (en, 71a0a789d9a8): Appropriate use of generative AI should apply the following parameters: Clear communication of the institutional/ departmental/ course regulations on the use of generative AI, including referencing generated content, developing proficiency in prompt generation, and harnessing the benefits of generative AI.
Historial de versiones
0 public release diffs
Cambios en las afirmaciones
3 Afirmación registros
teaching
UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
academic_integrity
UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Instantáneas de origen
3 source attributions
Staff Guide: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 may 2026, 5:23
UJ Practice Note: Generative Artificial Intelligence in Teaching, Learning and Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 may 2026, 5:23
UJ Quick Guide for Students: Using Generative Artificial Intelligence as a Learning Tool
official_pdf Tracker checked at 16 may 2026, 5:19