Change log

Queen Mary University of London

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims7Sources6Release records0

University page Public JSON Monthly report University index

Queen Mary University of London currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Queen Mary University of London. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

11 # Queen Mary University of London AI policy record
2+privacy: Queen Mary staff guidance says open-access GenAI tools are not secure for institutional data, and directs staff to use institutional Microsoft Copilot for sensitive, confidential, or internal-use-only information while not sharing internal-use Queen Mary data with external AI tools.
3+Evidence (en, 2186e211e6f9): It’s important to remember that data entered into open-access GenAI tools - including widely used platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and others - is not secure. Use Microsoft Copilot when working with sensitive, confidential, or internal-use-only information. Do not share any Queen Mary data designated for internal use with external AI tools.
4+academic_integrity: Queen Mary student guidance says any use of Generative AI must align with the Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy, and that AI use may be acceptable in some scenarios but not all.
5+Evidence (en, 8cd5cde03c31): Any use of Generative AI must align with Queen Mary’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy. AI use may be acceptable in some scenarios, but not all.
6+research: Queen Mary Doctoral College guidance tells postgraduate researchers to decide with supervisors which GenAI systems to use and why, keep detailed records of inputs and outputs, and reference and declare GenAI use in their work.
7+Evidence (en, 79a8536d26e0): With your supervisors, decide which system(s) you will use, why you will use them, and how you will use them. Keep detailed records of your inputs and outputs. Reference GenAI information and declare its use in your work.
8+privacy: Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff using built-in Copilot with a Queen Mary account get Microsoft 365 environment protections, and inputs are not stored or used for external model training.
9+Evidence (en, 1a1bf4282dfd): The green shield icon confirms you’re using the Queen Mary secure version of Copilot. This means: Your data stays within the Queen Mary’s Microsoft 365 environment. It meets institutional security and data protection requirements. Inputs are not stored or used for external model training.
10+source_status: Queen Mary publishes an official AI education guidance page that links AI principles, staff guidance, student guidance, PGR guidance, academic integrity resources, and the Policy Zone rather than presenting the guidance page itself as a standalone binding AI policy.
11+Evidence (en, d80971638c14): Our innovative use of AI in education is supported by policy and guidance for educators and students. Guidance for staff and students: Staff Guide to Generative AI; Student Guide to Generative AI; Academic Integrity at Queen Mary; AI for student learning and research; AI guidance for PGRs.
12+procurement: Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff intending to use Queen Mary data with a free AI tool must submit the tool for approval through the Ideas portal before using it.
13+Evidence (en, 1a1bf4282dfd): If you intend to use Queen Mary data (such as staff, student, research, or confidential information) with a free tool, you must submit the tool for approval via the Ideas portal – Software Request before you start using the tool
14+academic_integrity: Queen Mary’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy applies to all Queen Mary students and says actions undermining academic integrity may be misconduct in assessment or learning activities, including formative assessment.
15+Evidence (en, 415e04cdb99a): The Academic Integrity & Misconduct Policy applies to all students at Queen Mary. Academic Integrity is essential in all areas of academic life. Actions that undermine integrity may be considered misconduct in any assessment or activity, including formative assessment or learning activities.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

7 claim records

privacy

Queen Mary staff guidance says open-access GenAI tools are not secure for institutional data, and directs staff to use institutional Microsoft Copilot for sensitive, confidential, or internal-use-only information while not sharing internal-use Queen Mary data with external AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Queen Mary student guidance says any use of Generative AI must align with the Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy, and that AI use may be acceptable in some scenarios but not all.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Queen Mary Doctoral College guidance tells postgraduate researchers to decide with supervisors which GenAI systems to use and why, keep detailed records of inputs and outputs, and reference and declare GenAI use in their work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff using built-in Copilot with a Queen Mary account get Microsoft 365 environment protections, and inputs are not stored or used for external model training.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

Queen Mary publishes an official AI education guidance page that links AI principles, staff guidance, student guidance, PGR guidance, academic integrity resources, and the Policy Zone rather than presenting the guidance page itself as a standalone binding AI policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

procurement

Queen Mary IT FAQs say staff intending to use Queen Mary data with a free AI tool must submit the tool for approval through the Ideas portal before using it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Queen Mary’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy applies to all Queen Mary students and says actions undermining academic integrity may be misconduct in assessment or learning activities, including formative assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

6 source attributions